OESA-2026-4104 (CVE-2026-63435)

Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-09-25 01:28 – Updated: 2026-09-25 01:28 – Source website
VLAI
Summary
rubygem-mail security update
Details

A really Ruby Mail handler.

Security Fix(es):

Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input through q_value_decode and b_value_decode in lib/mail/utilities.rb. An attacker can make a display name or local part decode to a different address than intended by supplying a malformed RFC 2047 encoded-word, including one that embeds extra encoded-word markers or additional text. The decoders only matched the first encoded-word and used a greedy charset capture, so a crafted header could cause the parsed From, To, or Reply-To value to omit or reshuffle literal text. Applications that display, compare, or authorize based on the decoded address can then present or act on a spoofed sender or recipient address.(CVE-2026-63435)


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "noarch": [
          "rubygem-mail-2.8.1-2.oe2403sp1.noarch.rpm",
          "rubygem-mail-doc-2.8.1-2.oe2403sp1.noarch.rpm"
        ],
        "src": [
          "rubygem-mail-2.8.1-2.oe2403sp1.src.rpm"
        ]
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1",
        "name": "rubygem-mail",
        "purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/rubygem-mail\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.8.1-2.oe2403sp1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "severity": "Medium"
  },
  "details": "A really Ruby Mail handler.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nAffected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input through `q_value_decode` and `b_value_decode` in `lib/mail/utilities.rb`. An attacker can make a display name or local part decode to a different address than intended by supplying a malformed RFC 2047 encoded-word, including one that embeds extra encoded-word markers or additional text. The decoders only matched the first encoded-word and used a greedy charset capture, so a crafted header could cause the parsed `From`, `To`, or `Reply-To` value to omit or reshuffle literal text. Applications that display, compare, or authorize based on the decoded address can then present or act on a spoofed sender or recipient address.(CVE-2026-63435)",
  "id": "OESA-2026-4104",
  "modified": "2026-09-25T01:28:27Z",
  "published": "2026-09-25T01:28:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-4104"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63435"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.2",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "rubygem-mail security update",
  "upstream": [
    "CVE-2026-63435"
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…