JVNDB-2025-000110

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2025-11-25 08:17 - Updated:2025-11-25 08:17
Severity
Summary
Multiple vulnerabilities in Security Point (Windows) of MaLion
Details
Security Point (Windows) of MaLion provided by Intercom, Inc. contains multiple vulnerabilities listed below.
  • Incorrect default permissions (CWE-276) - CVE-2025-59485
  • Stack-based buffer overflow in processing HTTP headers (CWE-121) - CVE-2025-62691
  • Heap-based buffer overflow in processing Content-Length (CWE-122) - CVE-2025-64693
CVE-2025-59485 Ruslan Sayfiev of GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership. CVE-2025-62691, CVE-2025-64693 Denis Faiustov, and Ruslan Sayfiev of GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae, Inc. reported these vulnerabilities to JPCERT/CC. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer.
Show details on JVN DB website

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2025/JVNDB-2025-000110.html",
  "dc:date": "2025-11-25T17:17+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2025-11-25T17:17+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2025-11-25T17:17+09:00",
  "description": "Security Point (Windows) of MaLion provided by Intercom, Inc. contains multiple vulnerabilities listed below.\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003eIncorrect default permissions (CWE-276) - CVE-2025-59485\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eStack-based buffer overflow in processing HTTP headers (CWE-121) - CVE-2025-62691\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003eHeap-based buffer overflow in processing Content-Length (CWE-122) - CVE-2025-64693\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003eCVE-2025-59485\r\nRuslan Sayfiev of GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.\r\n\r\nCVE-2025-62691, CVE-2025-64693\r\nDenis Faiustov, and Ruslan Sayfiev of GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae, Inc. reported these vulnerabilities to JPCERT/CC.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2025/JVNDB-2025-000110.html",
  "sec:cpe": [
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:intercom:malioncloud",
      "@product": "Security Point (Windows) of MaLionCloud",
      "@vendor": "Intercom, Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:intercom:security_point_windows_of_malion",
      "@product": "Security Point (Windows) of MaLion",
      "@vendor": "Intercom, Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    }
  ],
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "9.8",
    "@severity": "Critical",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
    "@version": "3.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2025-000110",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN76298784/index.html",
      "@id": "JVN#76298784",
      "@source": "JVN"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59485",
      "@id": "CVE-2025-59485",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62691",
      "@id": "CVE-2025-62691",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64693",
      "@id": "CVE-2025-64693",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-Other",
      "@title": "No Mapping(CWE-Other)"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Multiple vulnerabilities in Security Point (Windows) of MaLion"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…