GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

JVNDB-2016-000112

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2016-06-20 08:19 - Updated:2022-08-09 05:08
Severity
Summary
Apache Struts vulnerable to validation bypass in Getter method
Details
Apache Struts provided by the Apache Software Foundation is a software framework for creating web applications in Java. Web applications that are developed using Apache Struts 2 contain a validation bypass in Getter method vulnerability. JPCERT/CC Addendum [Update: August 25, 2016] CVE-2016-4433 (S2-039) has been addressed in Struts 2.3.29, although the vendor has confirmed that similar issues still exist. According to the developer, these issues will be addressed in a future release. Takeshi Terada of Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
Impacted products
Show details on JVN DB website

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2016/JVNDB-2016-000112.html",
  "dc:date": "2022-08-09T14:08+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2016-06-20T17:19+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2022-08-09T14:08+09:00",
  "description": "Apache Struts provided by the Apache Software Foundation is a software framework for creating web applications in Java. \r\nWeb applications that are developed using Apache Struts 2 contain a validation bypass in Getter method vulnerability.\r\n\r\nJPCERT/CC Addendum\r\n[Update: August 25, 2016]\r\nCVE-2016-4433 (S2-039) has been addressed in Struts 2.3.29, although the vendor has confirmed that similar issues still exist. According to the developer, these issues will be addressed in a future release.\r\n\r\nTakeshi Terada of Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2016/JVNDB-2016-000112.html",
  "sec:cpe": {
    "#text": "cpe:/a:apache:struts",
    "@product": "Apache Struts",
    "@vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
    "@version": "2.2"
  },
  "sec:cvss": [
    {
      "@score": "6.8",
      "@severity": "Medium",
      "@type": "Base",
      "@vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
      "@version": "2.0"
    },
    {
      "@score": "5.6",
      "@severity": "Medium",
      "@type": "Base",
      "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "@version": "3.0"
    }
  ],
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2016-000112",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN45093481/index.html",
      "@id": "JVN#45093481",
      "@source": "JVN"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-4433",
      "@id": "CVE-2016-4433",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2016-4433",
      "@id": "CVE-2016-4433",
      "@source": "NVD"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-20",
      "@title": "Improper Input Validation(CWE-20)"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Apache Struts vulnerable to validation bypass in Getter method"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…