jvndb-2007-000491
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2008-05-21 00:00
Modified
2008-05-21 00:00
Severity ?
() - -
Summary
Lhaca LHZ Archive Extended Header Size Processing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Details
Lhaca does not process an LHZ archive with an invalid Extended Header Size properly, which could lead to buffer overflow. This problem is reported to be different from the issue identified in JVNDB-2007-000492 (CVE-2007-3375).
References
Impacted products
Show details on JVN DB website

To clipboard 

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2007/JVNDB-2007-000491.html",
  "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "description": "Lhaca does not process an LHZ archive with an invalid Extended Header Size properly, which could lead to buffer overflow.\r\nThis problem is reported to be different from the issue identified in JVNDB-2007-000492 (CVE-2007-3375).",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2007/JVNDB-2007-000491.html",
  "sec:cpe": {
    "#text": "cpe:/a:lhaca:file_archiver",
    "@product": "Lhaca",
    "@vendor": "Lhaca",
    "@version": "2.2"
  },
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "9.3",
    "@severity": "High",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C",
    "@version": "2.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2007-000491",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-3512",
      "@id": "CVE-2007-3512",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-3512",
      "@id": "CVE-2007-3512",
      "@source": "NVD"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25797",
      "@id": "SA25797",
      "@source": "SECUNIA"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2007/2399",
      "@id": "FrSIRT/ADV-2007-2399",
      "@source": "FRSIRT"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Lhaca LHZ Archive Extended Header Size Processing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.