gsd-2024-31950
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-04-11 05:03
Details
In FRRouting (FRR) through 9.1, there can be a buffer overflow and daemon crash in ospf_te_parse_ri for OSPF LSA packets during an attempt to read Segment Routing subTLVs (their size is not validated).
Aliases


To clipboard 

{
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2024-31950"
      ],
      "details": "In FRRouting (FRR) through 9.1, there can be a buffer overflow and daemon crash in ospf_te_parse_ri for OSPF LSA packets during an attempt to read Segment Routing subTLVs (their size is not validated).",
      "id": "GSD-2024-31950",
      "modified": "2024-04-11T05:03:20.620141Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2024-31950",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "In FRRouting (FRR) through 9.1, there can be a buffer overflow and daemon crash in ospf_te_parse_ri for OSPF LSA packets during an attempt to read Segment Routing subTLVs (their size is not validated)."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/commits/6b84541df71772f697a7f9e6b2aaf72536aab775",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/commits/6b84541df71772f697a7f9e6b2aaf72536aab775"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "In FRRouting (FRR) through 9.1, there can be a buffer overflow and daemon crash in ospf_te_parse_ri for OSPF LSA packets during an attempt to read Segment Routing subTLVs (their size is not validated)."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "En FRRouting (FRR) hasta 9.1, puede haber un desbordamiento del b\u00fafer y un bloqueo del daemon en ospf_te_parse_ri para paquetes OSPF LSA durante un intento de leer subTLV de enrutamiento de segmentos (su tama\u00f1o no est\u00e1 validado)."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2024-31950",
        "lastModified": "2024-04-08T18:48:40.217",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2024-04-07T21:15:07.540",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "url": "https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/"
          },
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "url": "https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/commits/6b84541df71772f697a7f9e6b2aaf72536aab775"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
        "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
      }
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.