GSD-2022-36076

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19
Details
NodeBB Forum Software is powered by Node.js and supports either Redis, MongoDB, or a PostgreSQL database. Due to an unnecessarily strict conditional in the code handling the first step of the SSO process, the pre-existing logic that added (and later checked) a nonce was inadvertently rendered opt-in instead of opt-out. This re-exposed a vulnerability in that a specially crafted Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack could theoretically take over another user account during the single sign-on process. The issue has been fully patched in version 1.17.2.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2022-36076
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2022-36076",
    "description": "NodeBB Forum Software is powered by Node.js and supports either Redis, MongoDB, or a PostgreSQL database. Due to an unnecessarily strict conditional in the code handling the first step of the SSO process, the pre-existing logic that added (and later checked) a nonce was inadvertently rendered opt-in instead of opt-out. This re-exposed a vulnerability in that a specially crafted Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack could theoretically take over another user account during the single sign-on process. The issue has been fully patched in version 1.17.2.",
    "id": "GSD-2022-36076"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2022-36076"
      ],
      "details": "NodeBB Forum Software is powered by Node.js and supports either Redis, MongoDB, or a PostgreSQL database. Due to an unnecessarily strict conditional in the code handling the first step of the SSO process, the pre-existing logic that added (and later checked) a nonce was inadvertently rendered opt-in instead of opt-out. This re-exposed a vulnerability in that a specially crafted Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack could theoretically take over another user account during the single sign-on process. The issue has been fully patched in version 1.17.2.",
      "id": "GSD-2022-36076",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:21.345761Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2022-36076",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC",
        "TITLE": "Account takeover via SSO plugins in NodeBB"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "NodeBB",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "\u003c 1.17.2"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "NodeBB"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "NodeBB Forum Software is powered by Node.js and supports either Redis, MongoDB, or a PostgreSQL database. Due to an unnecessarily strict conditional in the code handling the first step of the SSO process, the pre-existing logic that added (and later checked) a nonce was inadvertently rendered opt-in instead of opt-out. This re-exposed a vulnerability in that a specially crafted Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack could theoretically take over another user account during the single sign-on process. The issue has been fully patched in version 1.17.2."
          }
        ]
      },
      "impact": {
        "cvss": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        }
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://blogs.opera.com/security/2022/03/bug-bounty-adventures-a-nodebb-0-day/",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://blogs.opera.com/security/2022/03/bug-bounty-adventures-a-nodebb-0-day/"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/security/advisories/GHSA-xmgg-fx9p-prq6",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/security/advisories/GHSA-xmgg-fx9p-prq6"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/commit/a2400f6baff44cb2996487bcd0cc6e2acc74b3d4",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/commit/a2400f6baff44cb2996487bcd0cc6e2acc74b3d4"
          }
        ]
      },
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-xmgg-fx9p-prq6",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      }
    },
    "gitlab.com": {
      "advisories": [
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003c1.17.2",
          "affected_versions": "All versions before 1.17.2",
          "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-352",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2022-09-08",
          "description": "NodeBB Forum Software is powered by Node.js and supports either Redis, MongoDB, or a PostgreSQL database. Due to an unnecessarily strict conditional in the code handling the first step of the SSO process, the pre-existing logic that added (and later checked) a nonce was inadvertently rendered opt-in instead of opt-out. This re-exposed a vulnerability in that a specially crafted Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack could theoretically take over another user account during the single sign-on process. The issue has been fully patched in version 1.17.2.",
          "fixed_versions": [],
          "identifier": "CVE-2022-36076",
          "identifiers": [
            "CVE-2022-36076",
            "GHSA-xmgg-fx9p-prq6"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "",
          "package_slug": "npm/nodebb",
          "pubdate": "2022-09-02",
          "solution": "Unfortunately, there is no solution available yet.",
          "title": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)",
          "urls": [
            "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-36076",
            "https://blogs.opera.com/security/2022/03/bug-bounty-adventures-a-nodebb-0-day/",
            "https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/security/advisories/GHSA-xmgg-fx9p-prq6",
            "https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/commit/a2400f6baff44cb2996487bcd0cc6e2acc74b3d4"
          ],
          "uuid": "49345937-d8f0-40fe-949e-d47a08a1b54f"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:nodebb:nodebb:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "1.17.2",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2022-36076"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "NodeBB Forum Software is powered by Node.js and supports either Redis, MongoDB, or a PostgreSQL database. Due to an unnecessarily strict conditional in the code handling the first step of the SSO process, the pre-existing logic that added (and later checked) a nonce was inadvertently rendered opt-in instead of opt-out. This re-exposed a vulnerability in that a specially crafted Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack could theoretically take over another user account during the single sign-on process. The issue has been fully patched in version 1.17.2."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-352"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://blogs.opera.com/security/2022/03/bug-bounty-adventures-a-nodebb-0-day/",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://blogs.opera.com/security/2022/03/bug-bounty-adventures-a-nodebb-0-day/"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/security/advisories/GHSA-xmgg-fx9p-prq6",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/security/advisories/GHSA-xmgg-fx9p-prq6"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/commit/a2400f6baff44cb2996487bcd0cc6e2acc74b3d4",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/NodeBB/NodeBB/commit/a2400f6baff44cb2996487bcd0cc6e2acc74b3d4"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 1.6,
          "impactScore": 5.9
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2022-09-08T03:23Z",
      "publishedDate": "2022-09-02T13:15Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.