GSD-2022-35948

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19
Details
undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`=< undici@5.8.0` users are vulnerable to _CRLF Injection_ on headers when using unsanitized input as request headers, more specifically, inside the `content-type` header. Example: ``` import { request } from 'undici' const unsanitizedContentTypeInput = 'application/json\r\n\r\nGET /foo2 HTTP/1.1' await request('http://localhost:3000, { method: 'GET', headers: { 'content-type': unsanitizedContentTypeInput }, }) ``` The above snippet will perform two requests in a single `request` API call: 1) `http://localhost:3000/` 2) `http://localhost:3000/foo2` This issue was patched in Undici v5.8.1. Sanitize input when sending content-type headers using user input as a workaround.
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2022-35948",
    "description": "undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`=\u003c undici@5.8.0` users are vulnerable to _CRLF Injection_ on headers when using unsanitized input as request headers, more specifically, inside the `content-type` header. Example: ``` import { request } from \u0027undici\u0027 const unsanitizedContentTypeInput = \u0027application/json\\r\\n\\r\\nGET /foo2 HTTP/1.1\u0027 await request(\u0027http://localhost:3000, { method: \u0027GET\u0027, headers: { \u0027content-type\u0027: unsanitizedContentTypeInput }, }) ``` The above snippet will perform two requests in a single `request` API call: 1) `http://localhost:3000/` 2) `http://localhost:3000/foo2` This issue was patched in Undici v5.8.1. Sanitize input when sending content-type headers using user input as a workaround.",
    "id": "GSD-2022-35948",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-35948.html"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2022-35948"
      ],
      "details": "undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`=\u003c undici@5.8.0` users are vulnerable to _CRLF Injection_ on headers when using unsanitized input as request headers, more specifically, inside the `content-type` header. Example: ``` import { request } from \u0027undici\u0027 const unsanitizedContentTypeInput = \u0027application/json\\r\\n\\r\\nGET /foo2 HTTP/1.1\u0027 await request(\u0027http://localhost:3000, { method: \u0027GET\u0027, headers: { \u0027content-type\u0027: unsanitizedContentTypeInput }, }) ``` The above snippet will perform two requests in a single `request` API call: 1) `http://localhost:3000/` 2) `http://localhost:3000/foo2` This issue was patched in Undici v5.8.1. Sanitize input when sending content-type headers using user input as a workaround.",
      "id": "GSD-2022-35948",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:33.947982Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2022-35948",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC",
        "TITLE": "CRLF Injection in Nodejs \u2018undici\u2019 via Content-Type"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "undici",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "=\u003c 5.8.0"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "nodejs"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`=\u003c undici@5.8.0` users are vulnerable to _CRLF Injection_ on headers when using unsanitized input as request headers, more specifically, inside the `content-type` header. Example: ``` import { request } from \u0027undici\u0027 const unsanitizedContentTypeInput = \u0027application/json\\r\\n\\r\\nGET /foo2 HTTP/1.1\u0027 await request(\u0027http://localhost:3000, { method: \u0027GET\u0027, headers: { \u0027content-type\u0027: unsanitizedContentTypeInput }, }) ``` The above snippet will perform two requests in a single `request` API call: 1) `http://localhost:3000/` 2) `http://localhost:3000/foo2` This issue was patched in Undici v5.8.1. Sanitize input when sending content-type headers using user input as a workaround."
          }
        ]
      },
      "impact": {
        "cvss": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        }
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences (\u0027CRLF Injection\u0027)"
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component (\u0027Injection\u0027)"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/releases/tag/v5.8.2",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/releases/tag/v5.8.2"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-f772-66g8-q5h3",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-f772-66g8-q5h3"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/66165d604fd0aee70a93ed5c44ad4cc2df395f80",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/66165d604fd0aee70a93ed5c44ad4cc2df395f80"
          }
        ]
      },
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-f772-66g8-q5h3",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      }
    },
    "gitlab.com": {
      "advisories": [
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003c5.8.2",
          "affected_versions": "All versions before 5.8.2",
          "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-74",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2023-03-28",
          "description": "undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`=\u003c undici@5.8.0` users is vulnerable to _CRLF Injection_ on headers when using unsanitized input as request headers, more specifically, inside the `content-type` header. Example: ``` import { request } from \u0027undici\u0027 const unsanitizedContentTypeInput = \u0027application/json\\r\\n\\r\\nGET /foo2 HTTP/1.1\u0027 await request(\u0027http://localhost:3000, { method: \u0027GET\u0027, headers: { \u0027content-type\u0027: unsanitizedContentTypeInput }, }) ``` The above snippet will perform two requests in a single `request` API call: 1) `http://localhost:3000/` 2) `http://localhost:3000/foo2` This issue was patched in Undici v5.8.1. Sanitize input when sending content-type headers using user input as a workaround.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "5.8.2"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2022-35948",
          "identifiers": [
            "CVE-2022-35948",
            "GHSA-f772-66g8-q5h3"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions starting from 5.8.2",
          "package_slug": "npm/undici",
          "pubdate": "2022-08-15",
          "solution": "Upgrade to version 5.8.2 or above.",
          "title": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component (\u0027Injection\u0027)",
          "urls": [
            "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-35948",
            "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-f772-66g8-q5h3",
            "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/releases/tag/v5.8.2",
            "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/66165d604fd0aee70a93ed5c44ad4cc2df395f80"
          ],
          "uuid": "1c941332-5d09-40e0-9682-12ad26ed3894"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:undici:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "5.8.2",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2022-35948"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`=\u003c undici@5.8.0` users are vulnerable to _CRLF Injection_ on headers when using unsanitized input as request headers, more specifically, inside the `content-type` header. Example: ``` import { request } from \u0027undici\u0027 const unsanitizedContentTypeInput = \u0027application/json\\r\\n\\r\\nGET /foo2 HTTP/1.1\u0027 await request(\u0027http://localhost:3000, { method: \u0027GET\u0027, headers: { \u0027content-type\u0027: unsanitizedContentTypeInput }, }) ``` The above snippet will perform two requests in a single `request` API call: 1) `http://localhost:3000/` 2) `http://localhost:3000/foo2` This issue was patched in Undici v5.8.1. Sanitize input when sending content-type headers using user input as a workaround."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-74"
                },
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-93"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-f772-66g8-q5h3",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-f772-66g8-q5h3"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/releases/tag/v5.8.2",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Release Notes",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/releases/tag/v5.8.2"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/66165d604fd0aee70a93ed5c44ad4cc2df395f80",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/66165d604fd0aee70a93ed5c44ad4cc2df395f80"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 1.4
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2023-03-28T17:08Z",
      "publishedDate": "2022-08-15T11:21Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…