gsd-2022-24112
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:19
Details
An attacker can abuse the batch-requests plugin to send requests to bypass the IP restriction of Admin API. A default configuration of Apache APISIX (with default API key) is vulnerable to remote code execution. When the admin key was changed or the port of Admin API was changed to a port different from the data panel, the impact is lower. But there is still a risk to bypass the IP restriction of Apache APISIX's data panel. There is a check in the batch-requests plugin which overrides the client IP with its real remote IP. But due to a bug in the code, this check can be bypassed.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2022-24112",
"description": "An attacker can abuse the batch-requests plugin to send requests to bypass the IP restriction of Admin API. A default configuration of Apache APISIX (with default API key) is vulnerable to remote code execution. When the admin key was changed or the port of Admin API was changed to a port different from the data panel, the impact is lower. But there is still a risk to bypass the IP restriction of Apache APISIX\u0027s data panel. There is a check in the batch-requests plugin which overrides the client IP with its real remote IP. But due to a bug in the code, this check can be bypassed.",
"id": "GSD-2022-24112",
"references": [
"https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/cve/CVE-2022-24112"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-24112"
],
"details": "An attacker can abuse the batch-requests plugin to send requests to bypass the IP restriction of Admin API. A default configuration of Apache APISIX (with default API key) is vulnerable to remote code execution. When the admin key was changed or the port of Admin API was changed to a port different from the data panel, the impact is lower. But there is still a risk to bypass the IP restriction of Apache APISIX\u0027s data panel. There is a check in the batch-requests plugin which overrides the client IP with its real remote IP. But due to a bug in the code, this check can be bypassed.",
"id": "GSD-2022-24112",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:43.589800Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@apache.org",
"ID": "CVE-2022-24112",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "apisix/batch-requests plugin allows overwriting the X-REAL-IP header"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Apache APISIX",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "Apache APISIX 2.12",
"version_value": "2.12.1"
},
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "Apache APISIX 2.10",
"version_value": "2.10.4"
},
{
"version_affected": "\u003e=",
"version_name": "Apache APISIX 1",
"version_value": "1.3"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Apache Software Foundation"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Original discovery by Real World CTF at Chaitin Tech. Reported by Sauercloud."
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "An attacker can abuse the batch-requests plugin to send requests to bypass the IP restriction of Admin API. A default configuration of Apache APISIX (with default API key) is vulnerable to remote code execution. When the admin key was changed or the port of Admin API was changed to a port different from the data panel, the impact is lower. But there is still a risk to bypass the IP restriction of Apache APISIX\u0027s data panel. There is a check in the batch-requests plugin which overrides the client IP with its real remote IP. But due to a bug in the code, this check can be bypassed."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"impact": [
{
"other": "high"
}
],
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-290 Authentication Bypass by Spoofing"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/lcdqywz8zy94mdysk7p3gfdgn51jmt94",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/lcdqywz8zy94mdysk7p3gfdgn51jmt94"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20220211 CVE-2022-24112: Apache APISIX: apisix/batch-requests plugin allows overwriting the X-REAL-IP header",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/02/11/3"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166228/Apache-APISIX-Remote-Code-Execution.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166228/Apache-APISIX-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166328/Apache-APISIX-2.12.1-Remote-Code-Execution.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166328/Apache-APISIX-2.12.1-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"work_around": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "1. explicitly configure the enabled plugins in `conf/config.yaml`, ensure `batch-requests` is disabled. (Or just comment out `batch-requests` in `conf/config-default.yaml`)\nOr\n1. upgrade to 2.10.4 or 2.12.1."
}
]
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:apisix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "2.12.1",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.11.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:apisix:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "2.10.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@apache.org",
"ID": "CVE-2022-24112"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An attacker can abuse the batch-requests plugin to send requests to bypass the IP restriction of Admin API. A default configuration of Apache APISIX (with default API key) is vulnerable to remote code execution. When the admin key was changed or the port of Admin API was changed to a port different from the data panel, the impact is lower. But there is still a risk to bypass the IP restriction of Apache APISIX\u0027s data panel. There is a check in the batch-requests plugin which overrides the client IP with its real remote IP. But due to a bug in the code, this check can be bypassed."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-290"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/lcdqywz8zy94mdysk7p3gfdgn51jmt94",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Mitigation",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/lcdqywz8zy94mdysk7p3gfdgn51jmt94"
},
{
"name": "[oss-security] 20220211 CVE-2022-24112: Apache APISIX: apisix/batch-requests plugin allows overwriting the X-REAL-IP header",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Mitigation",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/02/11/3"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166228/Apache-APISIX-Remote-Code-Execution.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166228/Apache-APISIX-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166328/Apache-APISIX-2.12.1-Remote-Code-Execution.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/166328/Apache-APISIX-2.12.1-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"acInsufInfo": false,
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "HIGH",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2022-05-11T14:58Z",
"publishedDate": "2022-02-11T13:15Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…