GSD-2022-1318
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19Details
Hills ComNav version 3002-19 suffers from a weak communication channel. Traffic across the local network for the configuration pages can be viewed by a malicious actor. The size of certain communications packets are predictable. This would allow an attacker to learn the state of the system if they can observe the traffic. This would be possible even if the traffic were encrypted, e.g., using WPA2, as the packet sizes would remain observable. The communication encryption scheme is theoretically sound, but is not strong enough for the level of protection required.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2022-1318",
"description": "Hills ComNav version 3002-19 suffers from a weak communication channel. Traffic across the local network for the configuration pages can be viewed by a malicious actor. The size of certain communications packets are predictable. This would allow an attacker to learn the state of the system if they can observe the traffic. This would be possible even if the traffic were encrypted, e.g., using WPA2, as the packet sizes would remain observable. The communication encryption scheme is theoretically sound, but is not strong enough for the level of protection required.",
"id": "GSD-2022-1318"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-1318"
],
"details": "Hills ComNav version 3002-19 suffers from a weak communication channel. Traffic across the local network for the configuration pages can be viewed by a malicious actor. The size of certain communications packets are predictable. This would allow an attacker to learn the state of the system if they can observe the traffic. This would be possible even if the traffic were encrypted, e.g., using WPA2, as the packet sizes would remain observable. The communication encryption scheme is theoretically sound, but is not strong enough for the level of protection required.",
"id": "GSD-2022-1318",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:27.717334Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
"ID": "CVE-2022-1318",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Hills ComNav Inadequate Encryption Strength"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "ComNav",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c=",
"version_name": "All",
"version_value": "3002-19"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Interlogix"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Dr Paul Gardner-Stephen, Flinders University and DEWC Systems, Australia "
},
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Jacob Thompson, Flinders University, Australia"
},
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Dr Samuel Chenoweth, Defence Science and Technology Group, Australia"
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Hills ComNav version 3002-19 suffers from a weak communication channel. Traffic across the local network for the configuration pages can be viewed by a malicious actor. The size of certain communications packets are predictable. This would allow an attacker to learn the state of the system if they can observe the traffic. This would be possible even if the traffic were encrypted, e.g., using WPA2, as the packet sizes would remain observable. The communication encryption scheme is theoretically sound, but is not strong enough for the level of protection required."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-326 Inadequate Encryption Strength"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://www.corporate.carrier.com/Images/CARR-PSA-Hills-ComNav-002-1121_tcm558-149392.pdf",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://www.corporate.carrier.com/Images/CARR-PSA-Hills-ComNav-002-1121_tcm558-149392.pdf"
}
]
},
"solution": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Carrier recommends users upgrade to Version 4000-12 or later, which is the latest supported version at the time of this publication. Please contact the Hills distributor to acquire the firmware update.\nMore information on this issue can be found in Carrier product security advisory number CARR-PSA-002-1121.\n"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "CARR-PSA-2021-02",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:carrier:hills_comnav_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "3002-19",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:carrier:hills_comnav:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"cpe_match": [],
"operator": "AND"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
"ID": "CVE-2022-1318"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Hills ComNav version 3002-19 suffers from a weak communication channel. Traffic across the local network for the configuration pages can be viewed by a malicious actor. The size of certain communications packets are predictable. This would allow an attacker to learn the state of the system if they can observe the traffic. This would be possible even if the traffic were encrypted, e.g., using WPA2, as the packet sizes would remain observable. The communication encryption scheme is theoretically sound, but is not strong enough for the level of protection required."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-203"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://www.corporate.carrier.com/Images/CARR-PSA-Hills-ComNav-002-1121_tcm558-149392.pdf",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.corporate.carrier.com/Images/CARR-PSA-Hills-ComNav-002-1121_tcm558-149392.pdf"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"acInsufInfo": false,
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "LOCAL",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 2.1,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "LOW",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2023-07-24T13:35Z",
"publishedDate": "2022-04-20T16:15Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…