gsd-2021-23192
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:23
Details
A flaw was found in the way samba implemented DCE/RPC. If a client to a Samba server sent a very large DCE/RPC request, and chose to fragment it, an attacker could replace later fragments with their own data, bypassing the signature requirements.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2021-23192", "description": "A flaw was found in the way samba implemented DCE/RPC. If a client to a Samba server sent a very large DCE/RPC request, and chose to fragment it, an attacker could replace later fragments with their own data, bypassing the signature requirements.", "id": "GSD-2021-23192", "references": [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-23192.html", "https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-5003", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0008", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:5082", "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:4843", "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-23192", "https://advisories.mageia.org/CVE-2021-23192.html", "https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2021-23192", "https://linux.oracle.com/cve/CVE-2021-23192.html" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-23192" ], "details": "A flaw was found in the way samba implemented DCE/RPC. If a client to a Samba server sent a very large DCE/RPC request, and chose to fragment it, an attacker could replace later fragments with their own data, bypassing the signature requirements.", "id": "GSD-2021-23192", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:23:29.683695Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2021-23192", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "samba", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "Affects samba v4.10.0 to 4.15.1, Fixed in samba v4.15.2, v4.14.10 and v4.13.14." } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "A flaw was found in the way samba implemented DCE/RPC. If a client to a Samba server sent a very large DCE/RPC request, and chose to fragment it, an attacker could replace later fragments with their own data, bypassing the signature requirements." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation." } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019666", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019666" }, { "name": "https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2021-23192.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2021-23192.html" }, { "name": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-23192", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-23192" }, { "name": "GLSA-202309-06", "refsource": "GENTOO", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:samba:samba:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndExcluding": "4.15.2", "versionStartIncluding": "4.15.0", "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:samba:samba:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndExcluding": "4.14.10", "versionStartIncluding": "4.14.0", "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:samba:samba:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndExcluding": "4.13.14", "versionStartIncluding": "4.10.0", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2021-23192" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "A flaw was found in the way samba implemented DCE/RPC. If a client to a Samba server sent a very large DCE/RPC request, and chose to fragment it, an attacker could replace later fragments with their own data, bypassing the signature requirements." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-23192", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-23192" }, { "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019666", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Issue Tracking", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019666" }, { "name": "https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2021-23192.html", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Patch", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2021-23192.html" }, { "name": "GLSA-202309-06", "refsource": "GENTOO", "tags": [], "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202309-06" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "acInsufInfo": false, "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 5.0, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 3.6 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2023-09-17T09:15Z", "publishedDate": "2022-03-02T23:15Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.