GSD-2020-8664
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21Details
CNCF Envoy through 1.13.0 has incorrect Access Control when using SDS with Combined Validation Context. Using the same secret (e.g. trusted CA) across many resources together with the combined validation context could lead to the “static” part of the validation context to be not applied, even though it was visible in the active config dump.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2020-8664",
"description": "CNCF Envoy through 1.13.0 has incorrect Access Control when using SDS with Combined Validation Context. Using the same secret (e.g. trusted CA) across many resources together with the combined validation context could lead to the \u201cstatic\u201d part of the validation context to be not applied, even though it was visible in the active config dump.",
"id": "GSD-2020-8664",
"references": [
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0734"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-8664"
],
"details": "CNCF Envoy through 1.13.0 has incorrect Access Control when using SDS with Combined Validation Context. Using the same secret (e.g. trusted CA) across many resources together with the combined validation context could lead to the \u201cstatic\u201d part of the validation context to be not applied, even though it was visible in the active config dump.",
"id": "GSD-2020-8664",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:53.594489Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2020-8664",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CNCF Envoy through 1.13.0 has incorrect Access Control when using SDS with Combined Validation Context. Using the same secret (e.g. trusted CA) across many resources together with the combined validation context could lead to the \u201cstatic\u201d part of the validation context to be not applied, even though it was visible in the active config dump."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/v1.13.1/intro/version_history",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/v1.13.1/intro/version_history"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/security/advisories/GHSA-3x9m-pgmg-xpx8",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/security/advisories/GHSA-3x9m-pgmg-xpx8"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2020:0734",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0734"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:cncf:envoy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "1.13.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2020-8664"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CNCF Envoy through 1.13.0 has incorrect Access Control when using SDS with Combined Validation Context. Using the same secret (e.g. trusted CA) across many resources together with the combined validation context could lead to the \u201cstatic\u201d part of the validation context to be not applied, even though it was visible in the active config dump."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-287"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/v1.13.1/intro/version_history",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Release Notes",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/v1.13.1/intro/version_history"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/security/advisories/GHSA-3x9m-pgmg-xpx8",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/security/advisories/GHSA-3x9m-pgmg-xpx8"
},
{
"name": "RHSA-2020:0734",
"refsource": "REDHAT",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0734"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"acInsufInfo": false,
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 1.4
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2021-07-21T11:39Z",
"publishedDate": "2020-03-04T21:15Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…