gsd-2020-12457
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 4.5.0. It mishandles the change_cipher_spec (CCS) message processing logic for TLS 1.3. If an attacker sends ChangeCipherSpec messages in a crafted way involving more than one in a row, the server becomes stuck in the ProcessReply() loop, i.e., a denial of service.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2020-12457", "description": "An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 4.5.0. It mishandles the change_cipher_spec (CCS) message processing logic for TLS 1.3. If an attacker sends ChangeCipherSpec messages in a crafted way involving more than one in a row, the server becomes stuck in the ProcessReply() loop, i.e., a denial of service.", "id": "GSD-2020-12457" }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2020-12457" ], "details": "An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 4.5.0. It mishandles the change_cipher_spec (CCS) message processing logic for TLS 1.3. If an attacker sends ChangeCipherSpec messages in a crafted way involving more than one in a row, the server becomes stuck in the ProcessReply() loop, i.e., a denial of service.", "id": "GSD-2020-12457", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:49.621247Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2020-12457", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 4.5.0. It mishandles the change_cipher_spec (CCS) message processing logic for TLS 1.3. If an attacker sends ChangeCipherSpec messages in a crafted way involving more than one in a row, the server becomes stuck in the ProcessReply() loop, i.e., a denial of service." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/2927", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/2927" }, { "name": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/releases/tag/v4.5.0-stable", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/releases/tag/v4.5.0-stable" } ] } }, "gitlab.com": { "advisories": [ { "affected_range": "\u003c4.5.0", "affected_versions": "All versions before 4.5.0", "cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P", "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-1035", "CWE-20", "CWE-937" ], "date": "2021-07-21", "description": "wolfSSL mishandles the change_cipher_spec (CCS) message processing logic for TLS If an attacker sends `ChangeCipherSpec` messages in a crafted way involving more than one in a row, the server becomes stuck in the `ProcessReply()` loop, i.e., a denial of service.", "fixed_versions": [ "4.6.0" ], "identifier": "CVE-2020-12457", "identifiers": [ "CVE-2020-12457" ], "not_impacted": "All versions starting from 4.5.0", "package_slug": "conan/wolfssl", "pubdate": "2020-08-21", "solution": "Upgrade to version 4.6.0 or above.", "title": "Improper Input Validation", "urls": [ "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-12457" ], "uuid": "3ecb7d77-2505-4ba8-8598-781d7bbfeaf8" } ] }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:wolfssl:wolfssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "versionEndExcluding": "4.5.0", "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2020-12457" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 4.5.0. It mishandles the change_cipher_spec (CCS) message processing logic for TLS 1.3. If an attacker sends ChangeCipherSpec messages in a crafted way involving more than one in a row, the server becomes stuck in the ProcessReply() loop, i.e., a denial of service." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-835" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/releases/tag/v4.5.0-stable", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/releases/tag/v4.5.0-stable" }, { "name": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/2927", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Patch", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/2927" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "acInsufInfo": false, "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 5.0, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 2.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "MEDIUM", "userInteractionRequired": false }, "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.5, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 3.6 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2021-07-21T11:39Z", "publishedDate": "2020-08-21T14:15Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.