GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GSD-2019-9837

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2019-03-25 00:00
Details
Doorkeeper::OpenidConnect (aka the OpenID Connect extension for Doorkeeper) 1.4.x and 1.5.x before 1.5.4 has an open redirect via the redirect_uri field in an OAuth authorization request (that results in an error response) with the 'openid' scope and a prompt=none value. This allows phishing attacks against the authorization flow.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2019-9837
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2019-9837",
    "description": "Doorkeeper::OpenidConnect (aka the OpenID Connect extension for Doorkeeper) 1.4.x and 1.5.x before 1.5.4 has an open redirect via the redirect_uri field in an OAuth authorization request (that results in an error response) with the \u0027openid\u0027 scope and a prompt=none value. This allows phishing attacks against the authorization flow.",
    "id": "GSD-2019-9837"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "package": {
            "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
            "name": "doorkeeper-openid_connect",
            "purl": "pkg:gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect"
          }
        }
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2019-9837",
        "GHSA-vv4c-g6q7-p3q7"
      ],
      "details": "Doorkeeper::OpenidConnect (aka the OpenID Connect extension for Doorkeeper) 1.4.x and 1.5.x before 1.5.4 has an open redirect via the redirect_uri field in an OAuth authorization request (that results in an error response) with the \u0027openid\u0027 scope and a prompt=none value. This allows phishing attacks against the authorization flow.",
      "id": "GSD-2019-9837",
      "modified": "2019-03-25T00:00:00.000Z",
      "published": "2019-03-25T00:00:00.000Z",
      "references": [
        {
          "type": "WEB",
          "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#v154-2019-02-15"
        }
      ],
      "schema_version": "1.4.0",
      "severity": [
        {
          "score": 6.1,
          "type": "CVSS_V3"
        }
      ],
      "summary": "Doorkeeper::OpenidConnect Open Redirect"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2019-9837",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Doorkeeper::OpenidConnect (aka the OpenID Connect extension for Doorkeeper) 1.4.x and 1.5.x before 1.5.4 has an open redirect via the redirect_uri field in an OAuth authorization request (that results in an error response) with the \u0027openid\u0027 scope and a prompt=none value. This allows phishing attacks against the authorization flow."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/pull/66",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/pull/66"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/issues/61",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/issues/61"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db": {
      "cve": "2019-9837",
      "cvss_v3": 6.1,
      "date": "2019-03-25",
      "description": "Doorkeeper::OpenidConnect (aka the OpenID Connect extension for Doorkeeper) 1.4.x and 1.5.x before 1.5.4 has an open redirect via the redirect_uri field in an OAuth authorization request (that results in an error response) with the \u0027openid\u0027 scope and a prompt=none value. This allows phishing attacks against the authorization flow.",
      "gem": "doorkeeper-openid_connect",
      "ghsa": "vv4c-g6q7-p3q7",
      "patched_versions": [
        "\u003e= 1.5.4"
      ],
      "title": "Doorkeeper::OpenidConnect Open Redirect",
      "unaffected_versions": [
        "\u003c 1.4.0"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#v154-2019-02-15"
    },
    "gitlab.com": {
      "advisories": [
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003e=1.4.0 \u003c1.5.4",
          "affected_versions": "All versions starting from 1.4.0 before 1.5.4",
          "cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
          "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-601",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2019-03-27",
          "description": "`Doorkeeper::OpenidConnect` (aka the OpenID Connect extension for Doorkeeper) has an open redirect via the `redirect_uri` field in an OAuth authorization request (that results in an error response) with the `openid` scope and a `prompt=none value`. This allows phishing attacks against the authorization flow.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "1.5.4"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2019-9837",
          "identifiers": [
            "CVE-2019-9837"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions before 1.4.0, all versions starting from 1.5.4",
          "package_slug": "gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect",
          "pubdate": "2019-03-21",
          "solution": "Upgrade to version 1.5.4 or above.",
          "title": "URL Redirection to Untrusted Site (Open Redirect)",
          "urls": [
            "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9837"
          ],
          "uuid": "dabc68bd-3434-4227-90e3-61f0781585b2"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:openid:openid_connect:*:*:*:*:*:doorkeeper:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "1.5.4",
                "versionStartIncluding": "1.4.0",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2019-9837"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Doorkeeper::OpenidConnect (aka the OpenID Connect extension for Doorkeeper) 1.4.x and 1.5.x before 1.5.4 has an open redirect via the redirect_uri field in an OAuth authorization request (that results in an error response) with the \u0027openid\u0027 scope and a prompt=none value. This allows phishing attacks against the authorization flow."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-601"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/pull/66",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/pull/66"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/issues/61",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/issues/61"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper-openid_connect/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "acInsufInfo": false,
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.8,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
          "impactScore": 4.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": true
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6.1,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
          "impactScore": 2.7
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2019-03-27T13:04Z",
      "publishedDate": "2019-03-21T16:01Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.