gsd-2019-11409
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:24
Details
app/operator_panel/exec.php in the Operator Panel module in FusionPBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation that allows authenticated non-administrative attackers to execute commands on the host. This can further lead to remote code execution when combined with an XSS vulnerability also present in the FusionPBX Operator Panel module.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2019-11409


To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2019-11409",
    "description": "app/operator_panel/exec.php in the Operator Panel module in FusionPBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation that allows authenticated non-administrative attackers to execute commands on the host. This can further lead to remote code execution when combined with an XSS vulnerability also present in the FusionPBX Operator Panel module.",
    "id": "GSD-2019-11409",
    "references": [
      "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/cve/CVE-2019-11409"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2019-11409"
      ],
      "details": "app/operator_panel/exec.php in the Operator Panel module in FusionPBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation that allows authenticated non-administrative attackers to execute commands on the host. This can further lead to remote code execution when combined with an XSS vulnerability also present in the FusionPBX Operator Panel module.",
      "id": "GSD-2019-11409",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:24:02.013976Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2019-11409",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "app/operator_panel/exec.php in the Operator Panel module in FusionPBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation that allows authenticated non-administrative attackers to execute commands on the host. This can further lead to remote code execution when combined with an XSS vulnerability also present in the FusionPBX Operator Panel module."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/fusionpbx/fusionpbx/commit/e43ca27ba2d9c0109a6bf198fe2f8d79f63e0611",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/fusionpbx/fusionpbx/commit/e43ca27ba2d9c0109a6bf198fe2f8d79f63e0611"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153256/FusionPBX-4.4.3-Remote-Command-Execution.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153256/FusionPBX-4.4.3-Remote-Command-Execution.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://blog.gdssecurity.com/labs/2019/6/7/rce-using-caller-id-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-fusionpbx.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://blog.gdssecurity.com/labs/2019/6/7/rce-using-caller-id-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-fusionpbx.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155344/FusionPBX-Operator-Panel-exec.php-Command-Execution.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155344/FusionPBX-Operator-Panel-exec.php-Command-Execution.html"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:fusionpbx:fusionpbx:4.4.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2019-11409"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "app/operator_panel/exec.php in the Operator Panel module in FusionPBX 4.4.3 suffers from a command injection vulnerability due to a lack of input validation that allows authenticated non-administrative attackers to execute commands on the host. This can further lead to remote code execution when combined with an XSS vulnerability also present in the FusionPBX Operator Panel module."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-78"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/fusionpbx/fusionpbx/commit/e43ca27ba2d9c0109a6bf198fe2f8d79f63e0611",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/fusionpbx/fusionpbx/commit/e43ca27ba2d9c0109a6bf198fe2f8d79f63e0611"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://blog.gdssecurity.com/labs/2019/6/7/rce-using-caller-id-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-fusionpbx.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://blog.gdssecurity.com/labs/2019/6/7/rce-using-caller-id-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-fusionpbx.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153256/FusionPBX-4.4.3-Remote-Command-Execution.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Third Party Advisory",
                "VDB Entry"
              ],
              "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153256/FusionPBX-4.4.3-Remote-Command-Execution.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155344/FusionPBX-Operator-Panel-exec.php-Command-Execution.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Exploit",
                "Third Party Advisory",
                "VDB Entry"
              ],
              "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155344/FusionPBX-Operator-Panel-exec.php-Command-Execution.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "acInsufInfo": false,
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "SINGLE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
          "impactScore": 6.4,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.8,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
          "impactScore": 5.9
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2022-04-18T17:16Z",
      "publishedDate": "2019-06-17T19:15Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.