gsd-2017-9410
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9101. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9101. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9101 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
Aliases
Aliases
{ GSD: { alias: "CVE-2017-9410", description: "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9101. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9101. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9101 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.", id: "GSD-2017-9410", references: [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-9410.html", "https://advisories.mageia.org/CVE-2017-9410.html", "https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2017-9410", "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/cve/CVE-2017-9410", "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-9410", ], }, gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2017-9410", ], details: "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9101. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9101. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9101 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.", id: "GSD-2017-9410", modified: "2023-12-13T01:21:07.994814Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2017-9410", STATE: "REJECT", }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-9101. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-9101. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-9101 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.", }, ], }, }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.