gsd-2016-10117
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:21
Details
Firejail does not restrict access to --tmpfs, which allows local users to gain privileges, as demonstrated by mounting over /etc.
Aliases
Aliases
{ GSD: { alias: "CVE-2016-10117", description: "Firejail does not restrict access to --tmpfs, which allows local users to gain privileges, as demonstrated by mounting over /etc.", id: "GSD-2016-10117", references: [ "https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2016-10117", ], }, gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2016-10117", ], details: "Firejail does not restrict access to --tmpfs, which allows local users to gain privileges, as demonstrated by mounting over /etc.", id: "GSD-2016-10117", modified: "2023-12-13T01:21:26.262041Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2016-10117", STATE: "PUBLIC", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "n/a", version: { version_data: [ { version_value: "n/a", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "n/a", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "Firejail does not restrict access to --tmpfs, which allows local users to gain privileges, as demonstrated by mounting over /etc.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "n/a", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "[oss-security] 20170105 Re: Firejail local root exploit", refsource: "MLIST", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/05/4", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20170106 Re: Firejail local root exploit", refsource: "MLIST", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/06/2", }, ], }, }, "nvd.nist.gov": { configurations: { CVE_data_version: "4.0", nodes: [ { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:firejail_project:firejail:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, ], operator: "OR", }, ], }, cve: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2016-10117", }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "en", value: "Firejail does not restrict access to --tmpfs, which allows local users to gain privileges, as demonstrated by mounting over /etc.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-264", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "[oss-security] 20170106 Re: Firejail local root exploit", refsource: "MLIST", tags: [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/06/2", }, { name: "[oss-security] 20170105 Re: Firejail local root exploit", refsource: "MLIST", tags: [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/05/4", }, ], }, }, impact: { baseMetricV2: { acInsufInfo: true, cvssV2: { accessComplexity: "LOW", accessVector: "LOCAL", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "COMPLETE", baseScore: 7.2, confidentialityImpact: "COMPLETE", integrityImpact: "COMPLETE", vectorString: "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 10, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, severity: "HIGH", userInteractionRequired: false, }, baseMetricV3: { cvssV3: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "LOCAL", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 7.8, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "LOW", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 1.8, impactScore: 5.9, }, }, lastModifiedDate: "2017-04-19T19:39Z", publishedDate: "2017-04-13T14:59Z", }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.