gsd-2012-1620
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2012-1620", "description": "slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows.", "id": "GSD-2012-1620" }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-1620" ], "details": "slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows.", "id": "GSD-2012-1620", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:17.720780Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2012-1620", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_affected": "=", "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6" }, { "name": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48700", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48700" }, { "name": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/1", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/1" }, { "name": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/2", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/2" }, { "name": "http://www.osvdb.org/81035", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/81035" }, { "name": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52922", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52922" }, { "name": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645" }, { "name": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74666", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74666" }, { "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:suckless:slock:0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2012-1620" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-264" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "48700", "refsource": "SECUNIA", "tags": [ "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48700" }, { "name": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Exploit" ], "url": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120405 Re: CVE Request: slock-0.9 displays modal box after locking", "refsource": "MLIST", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/2" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120405 CVE Request: slock-0.9 displays modal box after locking", "refsource": "MLIST", "tags": [ "Exploit" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/1" }, { "name": "81035", "refsource": "OSVDB", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/81035" }, { "name": "http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6", "refsource": "CONFIRM", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Patch" ], "url": "http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6" }, { "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310" }, { "name": "52922", "refsource": "BID", "tags": [], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52922" }, { "name": "slock-xraisewindow-sec-bypass(74666)", "refsource": "XF", "tags": [], "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74666" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV2": { "cvssV2": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "LOCAL", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 3.6, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 4.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "severity": "LOW", "userInteractionRequired": false } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2017-08-29T01:31Z", "publishedDate": "2012-07-12T19:55Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…