CVE-2012-1620 (GCVE-0-2012-1620)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2012-07-12 19:00
Modified
2024-08-06 19:01
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
EPSS score ?
CWE
- n/a
Summary
slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T19:01:02.834Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120405 Re: CVE Request: slock-0.9 displays modal box after locking", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/2" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120405 CVE Request: slock-0.9 displays modal box after locking", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/1" }, { "name": "48700", "tags": [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_SECUNIA", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48700" }, { "name": "slock-xraisewindow-sec-bypass(74666)", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_XF", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74666" }, { "name": "81035", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_OSVDB", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/81035" }, { "name": "52922", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_BID", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52922" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2012-01-31T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2017-08-28T12:57:01", "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "shortName": "redhat" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120405 Re: CVE Request: slock-0.9 displays modal box after locking", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/2" }, { "name": "[oss-security] 20120405 CVE Request: slock-0.9 displays modal box after locking", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_MLIST" ], "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/1" }, { "name": "48700", "tags": [ "third-party-advisory", "x_refsource_SECUNIA" ], "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/48700" }, { "name": "slock-xraisewindow-sec-bypass(74666)", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_XF" ], "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74666" }, { "name": "81035", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_OSVDB" ], "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/81035" }, { "name": "52922", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_BID" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52922" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_CONFIRM" ], "url": "http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "assignerShortName": "redhat", "cveId": "CVE-2012-1620", "datePublished": "2012-07-12T19:00:00", "dateReserved": "2012-03-12T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T19:01:02.834Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2012-1620\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2012-07-12T19:55:05.577\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-11T00:51:21.963\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"slock 0.9 does not properly handle the XRaiseWindow event when the screen is locked, which might allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by pressing a button, which reveals the desktop and active windows.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Slock v0.9 no maneja adecuadamente el evento XRaiseWindow cuando la pantalla est\u00e1 bloqueada, lo que podr\u00eda permitir a atacantes pr\u00f3ximos obtener informaci\u00f3n sensible al presionar un bot\u00f3n, revelando as\u00ed el escritorio activo de Windows\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":3.6,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":4.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-264\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:suckless:slock:0.9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"59CA3F97-C343-4AFE-86AC-964A3D457FBD\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/48700\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/1\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/2\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.osvdb.org/81035\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52922\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74666\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://hg.suckless.org/slock/rev/891a4984aba6\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/48700\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/06/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.osvdb.org/81035\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52922\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401645\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786310\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74666\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…