gsd-2005-3058
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2005-3058


To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2005-3058",
    "description": "Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616.",
    "id": "GSD-2005-3058"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2005-3058"
      ],
      "details": "Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616.",
      "id": "GSD-2005-3058",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:12.528122Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2005-3058",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "20060213 URL filter bypass in Fortinet",
            "refsource": "FULLDISC",
            "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-February/042140.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "20060213 URL filter bypass in Fortinet",
            "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424858/100/0/threaded"
          },
          {
            "name": "fortinet-web-filter-bypass(24626)",
            "refsource": "XF",
            "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24626"
          },
          {
            "name": "16599",
            "refsource": "BID",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16599"
          },
          {
            "name": "18844",
            "refsource": "SECUNIA",
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18844"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FGA-2006-10.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FGA-2006-10.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "ADV-2006-0539",
            "refsource": "VUPEN",
            "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0539"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "3_beta",
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortios:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "2.8_mr10",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          },
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:fortinet:fortigate:2.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2005-3058"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Interpretation conflict in Fortinet FortiGate 2.8, running FortiOS 2.8MR10 and v3beta, allows remote attackers to bypass the URL blocker via an (1) HTTP request terminated with a line feed (LF) and not carriage return line feed (CRLF) or (2) HTTP request with no Host field, which is still processed by most web servers without violating RFC2616."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-264"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "20060213 URL filter bypass in Fortinet",
              "refsource": "FULLDISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-February/042140.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "18844",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18844"
            },
            {
              "name": "16599",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16599"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FGA-2006-10.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/FGA-2006-10.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "ADV-2006-0539",
              "refsource": "VUPEN",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/0539"
            },
            {
              "name": "fortinet-web-filter-bypass(24626)",
              "refsource": "XF",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24626"
            },
            {
              "name": "20060213 URL filter bypass in Fortinet",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/424858/100/0/threaded"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 6.4,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": true,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "HIGH",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2018-10-19T15:34Z",
      "publishedDate": "2005-12-31T05:00Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.