ghsa-xxm3-fp55-pm48
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:33
Modified
2022-05-13 01:33
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
A flaw was found in the way samba before 4.7.9 and 4.8.4 allowed the use of weak NTLMv1 authentication even when NTLMv1 was explicitly disabled. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to read the credential and other details passed between the samba server and client.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-1139"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-522"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-08-22T14:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A flaw was found in the way samba before 4.7.9 and 4.8.4 allowed the use of weak NTLMv1 authentication even when NTLMv1 was explicitly disabled. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to read the credential and other details passed between the samba server and client.",
"id": "GHSA-xxm3-fp55-pm48",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:33:29Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:33:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-1139"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2612"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2613"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3056"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-1139"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-52"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180814-0001"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3738-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2018-1139.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105084"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…