github - ghsa-xhj2-g5qf-66wr

ghsa-xhj2-g5qf-66wr

Vulnerability from github

Published

2022-05-17 05:28

Modified

2022-05-17 05:28

Details

The Diffie-Hellman key-exchange implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8, when FIPS mode is enabled, does not properly validate a public parameter, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain the shared secret key by modifying network traffic, a related issue to CVE-2011-1923.

Show details on source website

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-5095"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-06-20T17:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Diffie-Hellman key-exchange implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8, when FIPS mode is enabled, does not properly validate a public parameter, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain the shared secret key by modifying network traffic, a related issue to CVE-2011-1923.",
  "id": "GHSA-xhj2-g5qf-66wr",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:28:31Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:28:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-5095"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://discussions.nessus.org/thread/3381"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/psandqs.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.nessus.org/plugins/index.php?view=single\u0026id=53360"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

CVE-2011-5095 (GCVE-0-2011-5095)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2012-06-20 17:00

Modified

2024-09-16 20:31

Severity ?

CWE

n/a

Summary

The Diffie-Hellman key-exchange implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8, when FIPS mode is enabled, does not properly validate a public parameter, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain the shared secret key by modifying network traffic, a related issue to CVE-2011-1923.

References

URL

Tags

	http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/psandqs.pdf	x_refsource_MISC
	http://www.nessus.org/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=53360	x_refsource_MISC
	https://discussions.nessus.org/thread/3381	x_refsource_MISC

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	n/a	n/a	Version: n/a

Show details on NVD website

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-07T00:23:40.189Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/psandqs.pdf"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.nessus.org/plugins/index.php?view=single\u0026id=53360"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://discussions.nessus.org/thread/3381"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The Diffie-Hellman key-exchange implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8, when FIPS mode is enabled, does not properly validate a public parameter, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain the shared secret key by modifying network traffic, a related issue to CVE-2011-1923."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2012-06-20T17:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/psandqs.pdf"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.nessus.org/plugins/index.php?view=single\u0026id=53360"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://discussions.nessus.org/thread/3381"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2011-5095",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The Diffie-Hellman key-exchange implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8, when FIPS mode is enabled, does not properly validate a public parameter, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain the shared secret key by modifying network traffic, a related issue to CVE-2011-1923."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/psandqs.pdf",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/psandqs.pdf"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.nessus.org/plugins/index.php?view=single\u0026id=53360",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://www.nessus.org/plugins/index.php?view=single\u0026id=53360"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://discussions.nessus.org/thread/3381",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://discussions.nessus.org/thread/3381"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2011-5095",
    "datePublished": "2012-06-20T17:00:00Z",
    "dateReserved": "2012-06-20T00:00:00Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T20:31:45.218Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Tags

Taxonomy of the tags.

All sightings related to this event Export sightings related to this event

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.