ghsa-x93p-w2ch-fg67
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-12-10 18:20
Modified
2025-12-11 15:50
Severity ?
9.3 (Critical) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Summary
Ibexa User Bundle is missing password change validation
Details

Impact

The vulnerability is in the password change dialog in the back office. During the transition from v4 to v5 a mistake was made in the validation code which caused the validation of the previous password to not run as expected. This made it possible for a logged in user to change password in the back office without knowing the previous password. For example if someone logs in, leaves their workstation unlocked, and another person uses the same machine.

Credit

The issue was reported to us by Code-Rhapsodie. We thank them for their responsible disclosure! https://www.code-rhapsodie.fr/

Patches

  • See "Patched versions".
  • https://github.com/ibexa/user/commit/9d485bf385e6401c9f7ee80287d8ccd00f73dcf4

Workarounds

None.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "ibexa/user"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5.0.0-beta1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.0.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-67719"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-620"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-10T18:20:55Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-11T02:16:18Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nThe vulnerability is in the password change dialog in the back office. During the transition from v4 to v5 a mistake was made in the validation code which caused the validation of the previous password to not run as expected. This made it possible for a logged in user to change password in the back office without knowing the previous password. For example if someone logs in, leaves their workstation unlocked, and another person uses the same machine.\n\n### Credit\nThe issue was reported to us by Code-Rhapsodie. We thank them for their responsible disclosure!\nhttps://www.code-rhapsodie.fr/\n\n### Patches\n- See \"Patched versions\".\n- https://github.com/ibexa/user/commit/9d485bf385e6401c9f7ee80287d8ccd00f73dcf4\n\n### Workarounds\nNone.",
  "id": "GHSA-x93p-w2ch-fg67",
  "modified": "2025-12-11T15:50:05Z",
  "published": "2025-12-10T18:20:55Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ibexa/user/security/advisories/GHSA-x93p-w2ch-fg67"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-67719"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ibexa/user/commit/9d485bf385e6401c9f7ee80287d8ccd00f73dcf4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://developers.ibexa.co/security-advisories/ibexa-sa-2025-005-password-change-and-xss-vulnerabilities-in-back-office"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ibexa/user"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Ibexa User Bundle is missing password change validation"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.