GHSA-X843-M833-6F6F
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:34 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:34
VLAI
Details
The get_siz function in libavcodec/jpeg2000dec.c in FFmpeg before 2.1 does not ensure the expected sample separation, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds array access) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted JPEG2000 data.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2013-7016"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-12-09T16:36:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The get_siz function in libavcodec/jpeg2000dec.c in FFmpeg before 2.1 does not ensure the expected sample separation, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds array access) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted JPEG2000 data.",
"id": "GHSA-x843-m833-6f6f",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:34:43Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:34:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-7016"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/8bb11c3ca77b52e05a9ed1496a65f8a76e6e2d8f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201603-06"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/2848"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://ffmpeg.org/security.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/11/26/7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/12/08/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…