ghsa-x56p-cxvh-hvcq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:18
Modified
2025-04-20 03:38
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In Wireshark 2.2.0 to 2.2.6 and 2.0.0 to 2.0.12, the RGMP dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-rgmp.c by validating an IPv4 address.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-9354"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-06-02T05:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In Wireshark 2.2.0 to 2.2.6 and 2.0.0 to 2.0.12, the RGMP dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-rgmp.c by validating an IPv4 address.",
"id": "GHSA-x56p-cxvh-hvcq",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:38:24Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T01:18:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9354"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=1243"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13646"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=3a77395e651acd81eb41ffd8fbdbf711e1133d76"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=3a77395e651acd81eb41ffd8fbdbf711e1133d76"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2017-32.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98802"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038612"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…