GHSA-WWQ9-3CPR-MM53
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-04 18:29 – Updated: 2024-12-04 18:29
VLAI?
Summary
Borsh serialization of HashMap is non-canonical
Details
The borsh serialization of the HashMap did not follow the borsh specification. It potentially produced non-canonical encodings dependent on insertion order. It also did not perform canonicty checks on decoding.
This can result in consensus splits and cause equivalent objects to be considered distinct.
This was patched in 0.15.1.
Severity ?
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "hashbrown"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.15.0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.15.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-502"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-12-04T18:29:15Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The borsh serialization of the HashMap did not follow the borsh specification. It potentially produced non-canonical encodings dependent on insertion order. It also did not perform canonicty checks on decoding.\n\nThis can result in consensus splits and cause equivalent objects to be considered distinct.\n\nThis was patched in 0.15.1.",
"id": "GHSA-wwq9-3cpr-mm53",
"modified": "2024-12-04T18:29:15Z",
"published": "2024-12-04T18:29:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rust-lang/hashbrown/issues/576"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/kayabaNerve/hashbrown-borsh-poc"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/rust-lang/hashbrown"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0402.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Borsh serialization of HashMap is non-canonical"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…