ghsa-w8h6-6x8h-3fj6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:12
Modified
2022-05-02 03:12
Details

The Electronic Messaging System Microsoft Data Base (EMSMDB32) provider in Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server SP3 and Exchange Server 2003 SP2, as used in Exchange System Attendant, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application outage) via a malformed MAPI command, aka "Literal Processing Vulnerability."

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-0099"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-02-10T22:30:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Electronic Messaging System Microsoft Data Base (EMSMDB32) provider in Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server SP3 and Exchange Server 2003 SP2, as used in Exchange System Attendant, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application outage) via a malformed MAPI command, aka \"Literal Processing Vulnerability.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-w8h6-6x8h-3fj6",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:12:49Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:12:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0099"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-003"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6159"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/51838"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/33838"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-041A.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.