GHSA-VQPC-PM2X-2835

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ipmi: Fix user refcount underflow in event delivery

ipmi_alloc_recv_msg(user) takes the temporary user reference owned by the receive message, and ipmi_free_recv_msg() drops it again. If event delivery fails after allocating receive messages for earlier users, handle_read_event_rsp() rolls those messages back with ipmi_free_recv_msg().

That rollback path still drops user->refcount explicitly after freeing each message. The extra put can free a user that remains linked on intf->users, so later event delivery may dereference a freed user or trip refcount_t's addition-on-zero warning when ipmi_alloc_recv_msg() tries to acquire another reference.

Remove the stale explicit put and the now-dead user assignment. Keep the list_del() and ipmi_free_recv_msg() calls; they are the required rollback operations.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72042"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:21:13Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipmi: Fix user refcount underflow in event delivery\n\nipmi_alloc_recv_msg(user) takes the temporary user reference owned by the\nreceive message, and ipmi_free_recv_msg() drops it again. If event delivery\nfails after allocating receive messages for earlier users,\nhandle_read_event_rsp() rolls those messages back with\nipmi_free_recv_msg().\n\nThat rollback path still drops user-\u003erefcount explicitly after freeing each\nmessage. The extra put can free a user that remains linked on intf-\u003eusers,\nso later event delivery may dereference a freed user or trip refcount_t\u0027s\naddition-on-zero warning when ipmi_alloc_recv_msg() tries to acquire\nanother reference.\n\nRemove the stale explicit put and the now-dead user assignment. Keep the\nlist_del() and ipmi_free_recv_msg() calls; they are the required rollback\noperations.",
  "id": "GHSA-vqpc-pm2x-2835",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:06Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72042"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6aa9e61c46465d231e9beddf56af7effd71be682"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7be349d4fcc5e065295b83418a22d27a68afbdb6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddbb6e3dc9bb4743de686aa1598c31e745cee76b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…