ghsa-vjj3-m2jf-2pfq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-07-29 18:30
Modified
2024-07-29 18:30
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

x86: stop playing stack games in profile_pc()

The 'profile_pc()' function is used for timer-based profiling, which isn't really all that relevant any more to begin with, but it also ends up making assumptions based on the stack layout that aren't necessarily valid.

Basically, the code tries to account the time spent in spinlocks to the caller rather than the spinlock, and while I support that as a concept, it's not worth the code complexity or the KASAN warnings when no serious profiling is done using timers anyway these days.

And the code really does depend on stack layout that is only true in the simplest of cases. We've lost the comment at some point (I think when the 32-bit and 64-bit code was unified), but it used to say:

Assume the lock function has either no stack frame or a copy
of eflags from PUSHF.

which explains why it just blindly loads a word or two straight off the stack pointer and then takes a minimal look at the values to just check if they might be eflags or the return pc:

Eflags always has bits 22 and up cleared unlike kernel addresses

but that basic stack layout assumption assumes that there isn't any lock debugging etc going on that would complicate the code and cause a stack frame.

It causes KASAN unhappiness reported for years by syzkaller [1] and others [2].

With no real practical reason for this any more, just remove the code.

Just for historical interest, here's some background commits relating to this code from 2006:

0cb91a229364 ("i386: Account spinlocks to the caller during profiling for !FP kernels") 31679f38d886 ("Simplify profile_pc on x86-64")

and a code unification from 2009:

ef4512882dbe ("x86: time_32/64.c unify profile_pc")

but the basics of this thing actually goes back to before the git tree.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-42096"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-29T18:15:12Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86: stop playing stack games in profile_pc()\n\nThe \u0027profile_pc()\u0027 function is used for timer-based profiling, which\nisn\u0027t really all that relevant any more to begin with, but it also ends\nup making assumptions based on the stack layout that aren\u0027t necessarily\nvalid.\n\nBasically, the code tries to account the time spent in spinlocks to the\ncaller rather than the spinlock, and while I support that as a concept,\nit\u0027s not worth the code complexity or the KASAN warnings when no serious\nprofiling is done using timers anyway these days.\n\nAnd the code really does depend on stack layout that is only true in the\nsimplest of cases.  We\u0027ve lost the comment at some point (I think when\nthe 32-bit and 64-bit code was unified), but it used to say:\n\n\tAssume the lock function has either no stack frame or a copy\n\tof eflags from PUSHF.\n\nwhich explains why it just blindly loads a word or two straight off the\nstack pointer and then takes a minimal look at the values to just check\nif they might be eflags or the return pc:\n\n\tEflags always has bits 22 and up cleared unlike kernel addresses\n\nbut that basic stack layout assumption assumes that there isn\u0027t any lock\ndebugging etc going on that would complicate the code and cause a stack\nframe.\n\nIt causes KASAN unhappiness reported for years by syzkaller [1] and\nothers [2].\n\nWith no real practical reason for this any more, just remove the code.\n\nJust for historical interest, here\u0027s some background commits relating to\nthis code from 2006:\n\n  0cb91a229364 (\"i386: Account spinlocks to the caller during profiling for !FP kernels\")\n  31679f38d886 (\"Simplify profile_pc on x86-64\")\n\nand a code unification from 2009:\n\n  ef4512882dbe (\"x86: time_32/64.c unify profile_pc\")\n\nbut the basics of this thing actually goes back to before the git tree.",
  "id": "GHSA-vjj3-m2jf-2pfq",
  "modified": "2024-07-29T18:30:44Z",
  "published": "2024-07-29T18:30:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42096"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/093d9603b60093a9aaae942db56107f6432a5dca"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/161cef818545ecf980f0e2ebaf8ba7326ce53c2b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/16222beb9f8e5ceb0beeb5cbe54bef16df501a92"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/27c3be840911b15a3f24ed623f86153c825b6b29"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d07fea561d64357fb7b3f3751e653bf20306d77"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49c09ca35a5f521d7fa18caf62fdf378f15e8aa4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/65ebdde16e7f5da99dbf8a548fb635837d78384e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a3b65c8cbc139bfce9541bc81c1bb766e5ba3f68"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.