GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-VHCC-WFM4-93WW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 18:32 – Updated: 2026-07-21 18:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: mt76: mt7921: fix potential deadlock in mt7921_roc_abort_sync

roc_abort_sync() can deadlock with roc_work(). roc_work() holds dev->mt76.mutex, while cancel_work_sync() waits for roc_work() to finish. If the caller already owns the same mutex, both sides block and no progress is possible.

This deadlock can occur during station removal when mt76_sta_state() -> mt76_sta_remove() -> mt7921_mac_sta_remove() -> mt7921_roc_abort_sync() invokes cancel_work_sync() while roc_work() is still running and holding dev->mt76.mutex.

This avoids the mutex deadlock and preserves exactly-once work ownership.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53101"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-667"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T17:17:24Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: mt76: mt7921: fix potential deadlock in mt7921_roc_abort_sync\n\nroc_abort_sync() can deadlock with roc_work(). roc_work() holds\ndev-\u003emt76.mutex, while cancel_work_sync() waits for roc_work()\nto finish. If the caller already owns the same mutex, both\nsides block and no progress is possible.\n\nThis deadlock can occur during station removal when\nmt76_sta_state() -\u003e mt76_sta_remove() -\u003e mt7921_mac_sta_remove() -\u003e\nmt7921_roc_abort_sync() invokes cancel_work_sync() while\nroc_work() is still running and holding dev-\u003emt76.mutex.\n\nThis avoids the mutex deadlock and preserves exactly-once\nwork ownership.",
  "id": "GHSA-vhcc-wfm4-93ww",
  "modified": "2026-07-21T18:30:43Z",
  "published": "2026-06-24T18:32:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53101"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35180c772f5e11e2fa4d80d3dfd50906cb6d9646"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/91e77840bf13de3add125060cf8b32ca24a52c8c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4faaa617af3f4173e64169b0ec1af8f9c5bca10"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5059e52fd8bc624ec4255c9fa01a266513d126b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…