GHSA-VG87-MH5W-4J7P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-18 00:30 – Updated: 2025-01-18 00:30
VLAI?
Details

A buffer overflow vulnerability has been identified in the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) in various Lexmark devices. The vulnerability can be leveraged by an attacker to execute arbitrary code.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-50739"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-122"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-18T00:15:25Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A\u00a0buffer overflow vulnerability has been identified in the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) in various Lexmark\u00a0devices. The vulnerability can be leveraged by an attacker to execute arbitrary code.",
  "id": "GHSA-vg87-mh5w-4j7p",
  "modified": "2025-01-18T00:30:48Z",
  "published": "2025-01-18T00:30:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-50739"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.lexmark.com/en_us/solutions/security/lexmark-security-advisories.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…