ghsa-v97h-jqp9-pcjg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:14
Modified
2022-05-14 01:14
Severity ?
Details
In the DataBuf class in include/exiv2/types.hpp in Exiv2 0.26, an issue exists in the constructor with an initial buffer size. A large size value may lead to a SIGABRT during an attempt at memory allocation. NOTE: some third parties have been unable to reproduce the SIGABRT when using the 4-DataBuf-abort-1 PoC file.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-9145" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-03-30T08:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In the DataBuf class in include/exiv2/types.hpp in Exiv2 0.26, an issue exists in the constructor with an initial buffer size. A large size value may lead to a SIGABRT during an attempt at memory allocation. NOTE: some third parties have been unable to reproduce the SIGABRT when using the 4-DataBuf-abort-1 PoC file.", "id": "GHSA-v97h-jqp9-pcjg", "modified": "2022-05-14T01:14:55Z", "published": "2022-05-14T01:14:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-9145" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087879" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564281" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/xiaoqx/pocs/tree/master/exiv2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-14" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.