ghsa-v7fq-6h69-259m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:56
Modified
2022-05-17 04:56
Details
qemu-nbd in QEMU, as used in Xen 4.2.x, determines the format of a raw disk image based on the header, which allows local guest OS administrators to read arbitrary files on the host by modifying the header to identify a different format, which is used when the guest is restarted, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-2004.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-1922" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2013-05-13T23:55:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "qemu-nbd in QEMU, as used in Xen 4.2.x, determines the format of a raw disk image based on the header, which allows local guest OS administrators to read arbitrary files on the host by modifying the header to identify a different format, which is used when the guest is restarted, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-2004.", "id": "GHSA-v7fq-6h69-259m", "modified": "2022-05-17T04:56:51Z", "published": "2022-05-17T04:56:51Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1922" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-April/103621.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-April/103637.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-April/104036.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/55082" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201309-24.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/04/15/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/04/16/2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1028426" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.