ghsa-v5p7-jm9m-233r
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:56
Modified
2022-05-17 00:56
Details
The rtps_util_add_bitmap function in epan/dissectors/packet-rtps.c in the RTPS dissector in Wireshark 1.6.x before 1.6.13 and 1.8.x before 1.8.5 does not properly implement certain nested loops for processing bitmap data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a malformed packet.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-1579" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2013-02-03T01:55:00Z", "severity": "LOW" }, "details": "The rtps_util_add_bitmap function in epan/dissectors/packet-rtps.c in the RTPS dissector in Wireshark 1.6.x before 1.6.13 and 1.8.x before 1.8.5 does not properly implement certain nested loops for processing bitmap data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a malformed packet.", "id": "GHSA-v5p7-jm9m-233r", "modified": "2022-05-17T00:56:22Z", "published": "2022-05-17T00:56:22Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1579" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8198" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A16230" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-rtps.c?r1=47046\u0026r2=47045\u0026pathrev=47046" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revision\u0026revision=47046" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-02/msg00028.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-02/msg00037.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2013-01.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.