ghsa-rp4h-vf6c-9ffm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:30
Modified
2022-05-13 01:30
Details

GraphicsMagick 1.3.26 has a denial of service issue in ReadXBMImage() in a coders/xbm.c "Read hex image data" version==10 case that results in the reader not returning; it would cause large amounts of CPU and memory consumption although the crafted file itself does not request it.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-13777"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-834"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2017-08-30T09:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "GraphicsMagick 1.3.26 has a denial of service issue in ReadXBMImage() in a coders/xbm.c \"Read hex image data\" version==10 case that results in the reader not returning; it would cause large amounts of CPU and memory consumption although the crafted file itself does not request it.",
  "id": "GHSA-rp4h-vf6c-9ffm",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:30:16Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:30:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-13777"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/08/msg00002.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4222-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4321"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/rev/233a720bfd5e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/08/31/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100575"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.