GHSA-RFJ9-GW43-8W26
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:42 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:42
VLAI
Details
The Web TransferCtrl Class 8,2,1,4 (iManFile.cab), as used in WorkSite Web 8.2 before SP1 P2, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of SendNrlLink directives, which opens a separate window for each directive.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-1700"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-04-08T18:05:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Web TransferCtrl Class 8,2,1,4 (iManFile.cab), as used in WorkSite Web 8.2 before SP1 P2, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of SendNrlLink directives, which opens a separate window for each directive.",
"id": "GHSA-rfj9-gw43-8w26",
"modified": "2022-05-01T23:42:37Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T23:42:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-1700"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41757"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mwrinfosecurity.com/publications/mwri_interwoven-worksite-activex-control-remote-code-execution_2008-03-10.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…