GHSA-R72R-63QH-X7GR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-06 09:31 – Updated: 2026-10-07 09:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

dma-buf/dma-fence: fix checking signaling bit for timeline and driver name v3

The patch "dma-buf: dma-fence: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference" changed the check to test for the ops pointer instead of the signaled bit to avoid a potential NULL dereference when the ops pointer has been cleared.

The problem is now that the ops pointer is cleared only when neither the release nor the wait callback is implemented and this isn't true for a lot of dma_fence implementations yet. So those implementations lost the RCU protection after signaling of the returned string resulting in potential use after free.

Add the signaling check additional to the ops pointer check so that we have both the protection against NULL dereference as well as the RCU protection after signaling for the returned string.

v2: improve comments to note RCU protection and explain why we check both signaling state and ops pointer v3: some comment improvements suggested by Philip

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-98243"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-06T09:18:12Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndma-buf/dma-fence: fix checking signaling bit for timeline and driver name v3\n\nThe patch \"dma-buf: dma-fence: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference\"\nchanged the check to test for the ops pointer instead of the signaled\nbit to avoid a potential NULL dereference when the ops pointer has been\ncleared.\n\nThe problem is now that the ops pointer is cleared only when neither the\nrelease nor the wait callback is implemented and this isn\u0027t true for a lot\nof dma_fence implementations yet. So those implementations lost the RCU\nprotection after signaling of the returned string resulting in potential\nuse after free.\n\nAdd the signaling check additional to the ops pointer check so that we\nhave both the protection against NULL dereference as well as the RCU\nprotection after signaling for the returned string.\n\nv2: improve comments to note RCU protection and explain why we check\n    both signaling state and ops pointer\nv3: some comment improvements suggested by Philip",
  "id": "GHSA-r72r-63qh-x7gr",
  "modified": "2026-10-07T09:32:14Z",
  "published": "2026-10-06T09:31:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98243"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3ed11c671ff7ec58c8fd96410233c677df23f407"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4db25b8949d6ff9c1a685a1273a015e8bab29db"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…