GHSA-R48X-XHW6-JMG8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Reject negative const offsets for buffer pointers

The verifier rejects variable offsets for PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER and PTR_TO_BUF accesses, but it currently accepts a constant negative offset produced by pointer arithmetic.

Commit 022ac0750883 ("bpf: use reg->var_off instead of reg->off for pointers") moved constant pointer offsets from reg->off to reg->var_off. However, __check_buffer_access() continued to check only the instruction offset. An access with reg->var_off equal to -8 and an instruction offset of zero therefore passes verification.

For writable raw tracepoints, the access end is also calculated from the unsigned reg->var_off.value. An eight-byte access starting at -8 wraps the calculated end to zero, allowing the program to load and attach without increasing max_tp_access.

After ensuring that reg->var_off is constant, calculate the effective access start using signed arithmetic and reject it when it is negative. Use the validated start to calculate the access end for both PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER and PTR_TO_BUF.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-68462"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:18:39Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Reject negative const offsets for buffer pointers\n\nThe verifier rejects variable offsets for PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER and PTR_TO_BUF\naccesses, but it currently accepts a constant negative offset produced by\npointer arithmetic.\n\nCommit 022ac0750883 (\"bpf: use reg-\u003evar_off instead of reg-\u003eoff for\npointers\") moved constant pointer offsets from reg-\u003eoff to reg-\u003evar_off.\nHowever, __check_buffer_access() continued to check only the instruction\noffset. An access with reg-\u003evar_off equal to -8 and an instruction offset\nof zero therefore passes verification.\n\nFor writable raw tracepoints, the access end is also calculated from the\nunsigned reg-\u003evar_off.value. An eight-byte access starting at -8 wraps\nthe calculated end to zero, allowing the program to load and attach\nwithout increasing max_tp_access.\n\nAfter ensuring that reg-\u003evar_off is constant, calculate the effective\naccess start using signed arithmetic and reject it when it is negative.\nUse the validated start to calculate the access end for both\nPTR_TO_TP_BUFFER and PTR_TO_BUF.",
  "id": "GHSA-r48x-xhw6-jmg8",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:03Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-68462"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/314bd592085c0720ef519f6edbc5f41440ff78d4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd4cfa8c8f9a17cdec0539334d28754bc1d8a5d9"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…