ghsa-r32v-853x-3fjx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:14
Modified
2022-05-14 02:14
Details
Xen 4.4.x, 4.5.x, and 4.6.x does not limit the number of printk console messages when reporting unimplemented hypercalls, which allows local guests to cause a denial of service via a sequence of (1) HYPERVISOR_physdev_op hypercalls, which are not properly handled in the do_physdev_op function in arch/arm/physdev.c, or (2) HYPERVISOR_hvm_op hypercalls, which are not properly handled in the do_hvm_op function in arch/arm/hvm.c.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2015-7813", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2015-10-30T15:59:00Z", severity: "LOW", }, details: "Xen 4.4.x, 4.5.x, and 4.6.x does not limit the number of printk console messages when reporting unimplemented hypercalls, which allows local guests to cause a denial of service via a sequence of (1) HYPERVISOR_physdev_op hypercalls, which are not properly handled in the do_physdev_op function in arch/arm/physdev.c, or (2) HYPERVISOR_hvm_op hypercalls, which are not properly handled in the do_hvm_op function in arch/arm/hvm.c.", id: "GHSA-r32v-853x-3fjx", modified: "2022-05-14T02:14:02Z", published: "2022-05-14T02:14:02Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7813", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201604-03", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/171082.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/171185.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/171249.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3414", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034029", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-146.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.