ghsa-qxpj-m267-3648
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 01:25
Modified
2022-04-29 01:25
Details
Version 4 of the Kerberos protocol (krb4), as used in Heimdal and other packages, allows an attacker to impersonate any principal in a realm via a chosen-plaintext attack.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2003-0138" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2003-03-24T05:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Version 4 of the Kerberos protocol (krb4), as used in Heimdal and other packages, allows an attacker to impersonate any principal in a realm via a chosen-plaintext attack.", "id": "GHSA-qxpj-m267-3648", "modified": "2022-04-29T01:25:55Z", "published": "2022-04-29T01:25:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0138" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A248" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=104791775804776\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/advisories/MITKRB5-SA-2003-004-krb4.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-266" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-269" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-273" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/623217" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-051.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-052.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-091.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/316960/30/25250/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7113" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.