ghsa-qm9f-p7c7-h3m4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 06:15
Modified
2022-05-02 06:15
Details

The Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) implementation in crypto/cms/cms_asn1.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8o and 1.x before 1.0.0a does not properly handle structures that contain OriginatorInfo, which allows context-dependent attackers to modify invalid memory locations or conduct double-free attacks, and possibly execute arbitrary code, via unspecified vectors.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-0742"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2010-06-03T14:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) implementation in crypto/cms/cms_asn1.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8o and 1.x before 1.0.0a does not properly handle structures that contain OriginatorInfo, which allows context-dependent attackers to modify invalid memory locations or conduct double-free attacks, and possibly execute arbitrary code, via unspecified vectors.",
  "id": "GHSA-qm9f-p7c7-h3m4",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T06:15:15Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T06:15:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0742"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598738"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://kb.bluecoat.com/index?page=content\u0026id=SA50"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.balabit.com/pipermail/syslog-ng-announce/2011-January/000101.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.balabit.com/pipermail/syslog-ng-announce/2011-January/000102.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12395"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19693"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://cvs.openssl.org/filediff?f=openssl/crypto/cms/cms_asn1.c\u0026v1=1.8\u0026v2=1.8.6.1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=129138643405740\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2211\u0026user=guest\u0026pass=guest"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/40000"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/40024"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42457"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42724"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42733"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/57353"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1004564"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20100601.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40502"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1313"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3105"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.