ghsa-qh23-548p-jvf7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 17:52
Modified
2025-04-09 03:38
Details

Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP service in MailEnable Enterprise and Professional Editions 2.37 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the APPEND command. NOTE: this is probably different than CVE-2006-6423.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-1301"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-03-07T00:19:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP service in MailEnable Enterprise and Professional Editions 2.37 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the APPEND command.  NOTE: this is probably different than CVE-2006-6423.",
  "id": "GHSA-qh23-548p-jvf7",
  "modified": "2025-04-09T03:38:33Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T17:52:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-1301"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/32801"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/3397"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24361"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mailenable.com/hotfix"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22792"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017739"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0811"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…