ghsa-qf2w-6gx5-q88j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:08
Modified
2022-05-03 03:08
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in Fetchmail 6.1.3 and earlier does not account for the "@" character when determining buffer lengths for local addresses, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a header with a large number of local addresses.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2002-1365"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2002-12-23T05:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in Fetchmail 6.1.3 and earlier does not account for the \"@\" character when determining buffer lengths for local addresses, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a header with a large number of local addresses.",
"id": "GHSA-qf2w-6gx5-q88j",
"modified": "2022-05-03T03:08:08Z",
"published": "2022-05-03T03:08:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1365"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/10839"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000554"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103979751818638\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=104004858802000\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/052002.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-216"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.mandrakesoft.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2003:011"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-293.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-294.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-155.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6390"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…