GHSA-Q7GV-Q8JP-4PMJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-27 21:32 – Updated: 2025-02-27 21:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

erofs: fix buffer copy overflow of ztailpacking feature

I got some KASAN report as below:

[ 46.959738] ================================================================== [ 46.960430] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in z_erofs_shifted_transform+0x2bd/0x370 [ 46.960430] Read of size 4074 at addr ffff8880300c2f8e by task fssum/188 ... [ 46.960430] Call Trace: [ 46.960430] [ 46.960430] dump_stack_lvl+0x41/0x5e [ 46.960430] print_report.cold+0xb2/0x6b7 [ 46.960430] ? z_erofs_shifted_transform+0x2bd/0x370 [ 46.960430] kasan_report+0x8a/0x140 [ 46.960430] ? z_erofs_shifted_transform+0x2bd/0x370 [ 46.960430] kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0 [ 46.960430] memcpy+0x20/0x60 [ 46.960430] z_erofs_shifted_transform+0x2bd/0x370 [ 46.960430] z_erofs_decompress_pcluster+0xaae/0x1080

The root cause is that the tail pcluster won't be a complete filesystem block anymore. So if ztailpacking is used, the second part of an uncompressed tail pcluster may not be rq->pageofs_out.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-49464"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T07:01:22Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nerofs: fix buffer copy overflow of ztailpacking feature\n\nI got some KASAN report as below:\n\n[   46.959738] ==================================================================\n[   46.960430] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in z_erofs_shifted_transform+0x2bd/0x370\n[   46.960430] Read of size 4074 at addr ffff8880300c2f8e by task fssum/188\n...\n[   46.960430] Call Trace:\n[   46.960430]  \u003cTASK\u003e\n[   46.960430]  dump_stack_lvl+0x41/0x5e\n[   46.960430]  print_report.cold+0xb2/0x6b7\n[   46.960430]  ? z_erofs_shifted_transform+0x2bd/0x370\n[   46.960430]  kasan_report+0x8a/0x140\n[   46.960430]  ? z_erofs_shifted_transform+0x2bd/0x370\n[   46.960430]  kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0\n[   46.960430]  memcpy+0x20/0x60\n[   46.960430]  z_erofs_shifted_transform+0x2bd/0x370\n[   46.960430]  z_erofs_decompress_pcluster+0xaae/0x1080\n\nThe root cause is that the tail pcluster won\u0027t be a complete filesystem\nblock anymore. So if ztailpacking is used, the second part of an\nuncompressed tail pcluster may not be ``rq-\u003epageofs_out``.",
  "id": "GHSA-q7gv-q8jp-4pmj",
  "modified": "2025-02-27T21:32:14Z",
  "published": "2025-02-27T21:32:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49464"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d53a625f29074e7b8236c2c0e0922edb7608df9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b59e1907f58cf877c563dcf013159eb9f994b64"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcbe6803fffd387f72b48c2373b5f5ed12a5804b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…