ghsa-q4p2-hx8c-p7gh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:22
Modified
2025-04-09 04:09
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2000 SP3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large amount of data associated with unspecified atoms in a PowerPoint file that triggers memory corruption, aka "Data Out of Bounds Vulnerability."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-1131"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-05-12T22:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2000 SP3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large amount of data associated with unspecified atoms in a PowerPoint file that triggers memory corruption, aka \"Data Out of Bounds Vulnerability.\"",
"id": "GHSA-q4p2-hx8c-p7gh",
"modified": "2025-04-09T04:09:44Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:22:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1131"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-017"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5351"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/54393"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32428"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2008-46"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503451"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34841"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022205"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-132A.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/1290"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…