ghsa-q3gc-45gm-v55m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:46
Modified
2022-05-13 01:46
Severity ?
Details
wp-includes/ms-functions.php in the Multisite WordPress API in WordPress before 4.7.1 does not properly choose random numbers for keys, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a crafted (1) site signup or (2) user signup.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-5493" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-338" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-01-15T02:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "wp-includes/ms-functions.php in the Multisite WordPress API in WordPress before 4.7.1 does not properly choose random numbers for keys, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via a crafted (1) site signup or (2) user signup.", "id": "GHSA-q3gc-45gm-v55m", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:46:10Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:46:10Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-5493" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/WordPress/WordPress/commit/cea9e2dc62abf777e06b12ec4ad9d1aaa49b29f4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://codex.wordpress.org/Version_4.7.1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://wordpress.org/news/2017/01/wordpress-4-7-1-security-and-maintenance-release" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://wpvulndb.com/vulnerabilities/8721" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3779" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/14/6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95401" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037591" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.