ghsa-pvpx-24h7-j848
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:08
Modified
2022-05-03 03:08
Details

Buffer overflow in cnd-program for mgetty before 1.1.29 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a Caller ID string with a long CallerName argument.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-1391"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2003-01-17T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in cnd-program for mgetty before 1.1.29 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a Caller ID string with a long CallerName argument.",
  "id": "GHSA-pvpx-24h7-j848",
  "modified": "2022-05-03T03:08:08Z",
  "published": "2022-05-03T03:08:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1391"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/11072"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=105154413326136\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://search.alphanet.ch/cgi-bin/search.cgi?msgid=20021125142338.E12094%40greenie.muc.de\u0026max_results=1\u0026type=long\u0026domain=ml-mgetty"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-008.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-036.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7303"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…