ghsa-pq2v-pvrw-m6q9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:28
Modified
2022-05-17 00:28
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Memory leak in PolarSSL before 1.2.12 and 1.3.x before 1.3.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of crafted X.509 certificates. NOTE: this identifier has been SPLIT per ADT3 due to different affected versions. See CVE-2014-9744 for the ClientHello message issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-8628"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2015-08-24T15:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Memory leak in PolarSSL before 1.2.12 and 1.3.x before 1.3.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large number of crafted X.509 certificates. NOTE: this identifier has been SPLIT per ADT3 due to different affected versions. See CVE-2014-9744 for the ClientHello message issue.",
"id": "GHSA-pq2v-pvrw-m6q9",
"modified": "2022-05-17T00:28:35Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T00:28:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-8628"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://polarssl.org/tech-updates/releases/polarssl-1.2.12-released"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://polarssl.org/tech-updates/releases/polarssl-1.3.9-released"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-11/msg00079.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3116"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…