ghsa-phvv-9748-c5fx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:27
Modified
2022-05-13 01:27
Severity ?
Details
In Wireshark 2.6.0, 2.4.0 to 2.4.6, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.14, the LDSS dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-ldss.c by avoiding a buffer over-read upon encountering a missing '\0' character.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2018-11362", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-125", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2018-05-22T21:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "In Wireshark 2.6.0, 2.4.0 to 2.4.6, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.14, the LDSS dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-ldss.c by avoiding a buffer over-read upon encountering a missing '\\0' character.", id: "GHSA-phvv-9748-c5fx", modified: "2022-05-13T01:27:52Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:27:52Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-11362", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14615", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=f177008b04a530640de835ca878892e58b826d58", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/05/msg00019.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4217", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2018-25.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00027.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104308", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041036", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.