ghsa-phqx-w8fw-293w
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 06:09
Modified
2022-05-02 06:09
Details
The SMB implementation in the Server service in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2, Windows Server 2008 Gold, SP2, and R2, and Windows 7 does not properly validate request fields, which allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a malformed request, aka "SMB Pathname Overflow Vulnerability."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-0020" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20", "CWE-94" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-02-10T18:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The SMB implementation in the Server service in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2, Windows Server 2008 Gold, SP2, and R2, and Windows 7 does not properly validate request fields, which allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a malformed request, aka \"SMB Pathname Overflow Vulnerability.\"", "id": "GHSA-phqx-w8fw-293w", "modified": "2022-05-02T06:09:45Z", "published": "2022-05-02T06:09:45Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0020" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2010/ms10-012" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A8438" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA10-040A.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.